From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this time]
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 19:07:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D893165.10106@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20020918.182855.47438220.davem@redhat.com
David S. Miller wrote:
> It's hash lookup code, nearly identical to ipv4 version except
> it's dealing with 128-bit IP addresses instead of 32-bit.
>
> You give up way too easily, which leads me to belive you'll disappear
> just as easily if complicated bugs stop popping up as a result of your
> changes.
I'll maintain this patch for myself if no one else, so I will not
go away. But, since I am new to this code, and do not have a test
setup to test the ipv6 changes, I was hesitant. I can at the least
patch it how I think it should be and test that ipv4 still works and
it compiles. If you or someone else can do more profound testing on
it, then that would be great.
> The #ifdefs were per request, I personally would like them not to be there
> either. As far as I can tell, the changes are backwards compatible, so there
> should be no need for ifdefs.
>
> I mean put the ifdefs in a header file such as tcp.h, not in the *.c
> code.
Would you object to me just removing all of them and having the patch
unconditionally compiled in?
> I don't require you to test the ipv6 portions, I will be able to
> eyeball them and know if they are right or not, this is how simple
> the ipv6 version of the tcp bits will be.
Ok, I'll work up a patch with the ipv6 support and try to get that
out sometime next week.
Thanks,
Ben
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> <Ben_Greear AT excite.com>
President of Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
ScryMUD: http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-19 2:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-18 6:47 [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self Ben Greear
2002-09-18 6:44 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-18 6:53 ` Ben Greear
2002-09-18 7:09 ` [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this time] Ben Greear
2002-09-18 22:55 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-18 23:20 ` Ben Greear
2002-09-19 1:28 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-19 2:07 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2002-09-19 2:01 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-19 3:04 ` Ben Greear
2002-09-27 1:00 ` [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this kuznet
2002-09-27 1:30 ` Ben Greear
2002-09-27 3:36 ` kuznet
2002-09-27 6:33 ` Ben Greear
2002-09-27 15:01 ` kuznet
2002-09-27 15:40 ` Ben Greear
2002-09-27 15:46 ` kuznet
2002-09-27 15:53 ` Ben Greear
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D893165.10106@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).