From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Richard Gooch <rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca>
Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Poor gige performance with 2.4.20-pre*
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 19:32:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D966656.7040205@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 200209282257.g8SMvta32527@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca
Richard Gooch wrote:
> Hi, all. For a while now I've noticed poor performance with gige
> cards under 2.4.19 and 2.4.20-pre*. At first I thought it was because
> of the cheap-ass Addtron cards I bought (these use the ns83820 chip).
> But now that the Intel E1000 cards are pretty cheap too, I've grabbed
> a couple (part number: PWLA8390MT) and see the same problem. In fact,
> the E1000 cards are no better than the Addtron cards. I'm using the
> D-Link DGS-1008T 8-port gige switch. MTU=1500 bytes.
Machine: dual Athlon, 1.66Ghz, 64/66Mhz pci, 512MB RAM,
2 Intel PRO/1000 MT server NICs.
Kernel: 2.4.20-pre7, pre8 (same behaviour)
I was able to send and
receive 400Mbps between two cards on the machine simultaneously.
This is sustained over a period of time untill the box crashes
after an hour or so :(
Using pktgen, I could generate 860Mbps in one direction from one port
to another on the same machine (crashed after an hour or so here too).
Try setting the TxDescriptors=4096 RxDescriptors=1024 when loading the
e1000 module, that helps tremendously when using smaller packets.
I tried the e1000 driver in 2.5.38 on the machine, it ran at about 1/3 of
the speed, and crashed in under 5 minutes...
So, the performance could be better, but what is really killing me is
stability at this point...
>
> The basic test I do is to send 100 MB over a TCP connection from one
> machine to the other. The results are:
>
> Dual PIII 450 MHz -> Dual Athalon 1.6 GHz yields 58 MB/s
> Dual Athalon 1.6 GHz -> Dual PIII 450 MHz yields 23 MB/s
>
> This is quite a bit less than what gige is supposed to give. Is this
> expected?
>
> Regards,
>
> Richard....
> Permanent: rgooch@atnf.csiro.au
> Current: rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca
>
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> <Ben_Greear AT excite.com>
President of Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
ScryMUD: http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-29 2:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-28 22:57 Poor gige performance with 2.4.20-pre* Richard Gooch
2002-09-29 2:12 ` Xiaoliang (David) Wei
2002-09-29 6:34 ` Richard Gooch
2002-09-30 0:45 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-09-30 0:53 ` Richard Gooch
2002-09-29 2:32 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2002-09-29 19:22 ` Richard Gooch
2002-09-29 19:32 ` Ben Greear
2002-09-29 20:54 ` Richard Gooch
2002-09-30 21:21 ` Jon Fraser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D966656.7040205@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).