From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Greear Subject: Re: [VLAN] VLAN patches Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 09:19:39 -0700 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <3D98799B.9060008@candelatech.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com Return-path: To: vlan@Scry.WANfear.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Dave Santucci wrote: > Bjorn > Since the data type for the vlan_id is specified as an "unsigned short= ", > The comparison (vlan_id < 0) will always be false due to the range of = the data > type. >=20 > -ds > =09 >=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Andersson Bj=F6rn [mailto:Bjorn.Andersson@ebc.ericsson.se]=20 > Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 1:24 AM > To: netdev@oss.sgi.com > Subject: [VLAN] VLAN patches >=20 > Hi, > I hope you are the right receiver of 8021q-patches. > We are running SuSe 8.0, i.e kernel 2.4.18. >=20 > - When addding several egress-mappings we get stuck in an eternal > loop if they end up in the same hash-bucket, see vlan_dev.c.path. >=20 > - If we try to remove a vlan with VID 0, ifconfig stops working > completly. > We fixed it with vlan.c.patch. Is there any reason to ever let someone add a VLAN of ID 0 in the first p= lace? Ben >=20 >=20 --=20 Ben Greear President of Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com ScryMUD: http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear