From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Greear Subject: Re: VLAN patches Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2002 20:35:38 -0700 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <3DA1010A.8020202@candelatech.com> References: <20021005.220549.15266753.davem@redhat.com> <20021006.194654.35505461.davem@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: hadi@cyberus.ca, Bjorn.Andersson@ebc.ericsson.se, netdev@oss.sgi.com Return-path: To: "David S. Miller" Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org David S. Miller wrote: > From: jamal > Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2002 18:47:50 -0400 (EDT) > > A packet with VLANid 0 and an 802.1p tag > 0 is legal. I > think its known as a "priority tagged" packet (not 100% sure > about the term). Therefore VLANid 0 MUST be accepted and ability to send > it should be there. > > Great, I stand corrected, please send me a patch which therefore > accepts VID 0 on create and destroy. It already accepts on create, you just need to add the patch that was already sent to allow for delete. > > BTW, what about VLANid 0xFFF? I think it is reserved, but my spec is 3 years old, and I don't know where it is right now, so whatever it is now, let's not touch it :) > > Your guess is as good as mine ;-) > -- Ben Greear President of Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com ScryMUD: http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear