From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Greear Subject: Re: [RESEND] tuning linux for high network performance? Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 10:10:55 -0700 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <3DB6D81F.2050309@candelatech.com> References: <200210231218.18733.roy@karlsbakk.net> <20021023130101.GA646@outpost.ds9a.nl> <1035379308.5950.3.camel@rth.ninka.net> <200210231542.48673.roy@karlsbakk.net> <20021023170102.GA5302@outpost.ds9a.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk , "David S. Miller" , netdev@oss.sgi.com, Kernel mailing list Return-path: To: bert hubert Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org bert hubert wrote: > I still refuse to believe that a 1.8GHz Pentium4 can only checksum > 250megabits/second. MD Raid5 does better and they probably don't use a > checksum as braindead as that used by TCP. For what it's worth, I have been able to send and receive 400+ Mbps of traffic, by directional, on the same machine (ie, about 1600 Mbps of payload across the PCI bus) So, it's probably not the e1000 or networking code that is slowing you down. (This was on a 64/66 PCI, Dual-AMD 2Ghz machine though, are you running only 32/33 PCI? If not, where did you find this motherboard!) Have you tried just reading the information from disk and doing everying except the final 'send/write/sendto' ? That would help determine if it is your file reads that are killing you. Ben -- Ben Greear President of Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com ScryMUD: http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear