From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Krishna Kumar Subject: [PATCH] - Wrong use of RTM_BASE in XFRM message types. Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 11:14:10 -0700 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <3ECE64F2.5000300@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com, linux-net@vger.kernel.org Return-path: To: davem@redhat.com, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Hi, I am using 2.5.68 and found XFRM_MSG_BASE being defined, but RTM_BASE used for all XFRM messages, changed it. Current mailer (hopefully) shouldn't screw up the tabs. Thanks, - KK diff -ruN linux-2.5.68.org/include/linux/xfrm.h linux-2.5.68/include/linux/xfrm.h --- linux-2.5.68.org/include/linux/xfrm.h 2003-05-23 11:02:27.000000000 -0700 +++ linux-2.5.68/include/linux/xfrm.h 2003-05-23 11:04:02.000000000 -0700 @@ -104,17 +104,17 @@ /* Netlink configuration messages. */ #define XFRM_MSG_BASE 0x10 -#define XFRM_MSG_NEWSA (RTM_BASE + 0) -#define XFRM_MSG_DELSA (RTM_BASE + 1) -#define XFRM_MSG_GETSA (RTM_BASE + 2) - -#define XFRM_MSG_NEWPOLICY (RTM_BASE + 3) -#define XFRM_MSG_DELPOLICY (RTM_BASE + 4) -#define XFRM_MSG_GETPOLICY (RTM_BASE + 5) - -#define XFRM_MSG_ALLOCSPI (RTM_BASE + 6) -#define XFRM_MSG_ACQUIRE (RTM_BASE + 7) -#define XFRM_MSG_EXPIRE (RTM_BASE + 8) +#define XFRM_MSG_NEWSA (XFRM_MSG_BASE + 0) +#define XFRM_MSG_DELSA (XFRM_MSG_BASE + 1) +#define XFRM_MSG_GETSA (XFRM_MSG_BASE + 2) + +#define XFRM_MSG_NEWPOLICY (XFRM_MSG_BASE + 3) +#define XFRM_MSG_DELPOLICY (XFRM_MSG_BASE + 4) +#define XFRM_MSG_GETPOLICY (XFRM_MSG_BASE + 5) + +#define XFRM_MSG_ALLOCSPI (XFRM_MSG_BASE + 6) +#define XFRM_MSG_ACQUIRE (XFRM_MSG_BASE + 7) +#define XFRM_MSG_EXPIRE (XFRM_MSG_BASE + 8) #define XFRM_MSG_MAX (XFRM_MSG_EXPIRE+1)