From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mika_Penttil=E4?= Subject: Re: 2.4.21+ - IPv6 over IPv4 tunneling b0rked Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 12:39:50 +0300 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <3F0E85E6.7050001@kolumbus.fi> References: <20030711.143926.599349332.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> <20030711.180449.126456521.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: pekkas@netcore.fi, mika.liljeberg@welho.com, andre@tomt.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org Return-path: To: YOSHIFUJI@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Who adds the subnet router anycast address, kernel itself? Since what? I don't see this in 2.5. --Mika YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ???? wrote: >In article (at Fri, 11 Jul 2003 11:46:00 +0300 (EEST)), Pekka Savola says: > > > >>>I don't like this >>>while I would be ok to have configuration option >>>not to support anycast. >>> >>> >>With "not to support anycast" you probably meant "not to support >>subnet-router anycast address [automatically, in the kernel, as now]" ? >>These are entirely different things. >> >> > >I meant disabling anycast entirely. > > > >>(Note that if there's a user-level API for setting anycast addresses, one >>could kick the subnet-router anycast address out of the kernel too. >>Whether that's desirable is another thing.) >> >> > >We have but we cannot; it is refcnt'ed. > >--yoshfuji >- >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in >the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > > >