Hi, Scott

This change seems to fix the problem.
Thanks a lot !

Felix.

Feldman, Scott wrote:

>>I've also noticed that the number of hard_start_xmit failures 
>>in e1000 has increased significantly in version 5.1.13-k1. In 
>>version 5.0.43-k1 the number of failures was much smaller.
>>    
>>
>
>Interesting.  Felix, would you undo the change[1] below in 5.1.13-k1 and
>see what happens?  With the change below, 5.1.13 would be more
>aggressive on Tx cleanup, so we'll be quicker waking the queue than
>before. 
>
>-scott
>
>        for(i = 0; i < E1000_MAX_INTR; i++)
>-               if(!e1000_clean_rx_irq(adapter) &&
>+               if(!e1000_clean_rx_irq(adapter) &
>                   !e1000_clean_tx_irq(adapter))
>                        break;
>
>[1] Something still bothers me about this new form where we're mixing a
>bit-wise operator with logical operands.  Should this bother me?
>
>  
>