From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roman Pletka Subject: Re: [2.4 PATCH] bugfix: ARP respond on all devices Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 10:49:46 +0200 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <3F43362A.7090802@zurich.ibm.com> References: <353568DCBAE06148B70767C1B1A93E625EAB58@post.pc.aspectgroup.co.uk><20030819145403.GA3407@alpha.home.local><20030819170751.2b92ba2e.skraw@ithnet.com><20030819085717.56046afd.davem@redhat.com><20030819185219.116fd259.skraw@ithnet.com><1061319864.30565.52.camel@dhcp23.swansea.linux.org.uk> <20030819120131.1999b1ec.davem@redhat.com> <091f01c36686$dade2bf0$c801a8c0@llewella> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "David S. Miller" , Alan Cox , skraw@ithnet.com, willy@w.ods.org, richard@aspectgroup.co.uk, carlosev@newipnet.com, lamont@scriptkiddie.org, davidsen@tmr.com, marcelo@conectiva.com.br, netdev@oss.sgi.com, linux-net@vger.kernel.org, layes@loran.com, torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: To: Bas Bloemsaat Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Bas Bloemsaat wrote: >>Indeed, would people stop quoting from RFC 985 and >>RFC 826. > > > RFC 826 is referenced from 1009 as describing ARP. So in effect it does > define a standard. RFC 1009 is obsolete too (by 1812 for the sake of completeness). Please stop quoting obsolete RFC's. -- Roman