From: Jim Keniston <jkenisto@us.ibm.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@oss.sgi.com>,
"Feldman, Scott" <scott.feldman@intel.com>,
Larry Kessler <kessler@us.ibm.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rddunlap@osdl.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Net device error logging, revised
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 18:07:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F4C046D.77CF7E03@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3F4BF265.5050101@pobox.com
Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> Jim Keniston wrote:
> > #define netdev_printk(sevlevel, netdev, msglevel, format, arg...) \
> > do { \
> > if (NETIF_MSG_##msglevel == NETIF_MSG_ALL || ((netdev)->msg_enable & NETIF_MSG_##msglevel)) { \
> > char pfx[40]; \
> > printk(sevlevel "%s: " format , make_netdev_msg_prefix(pfx, netdev) , ## arg); \
> > }} while (0)
> >
> > This would make your code bigger, but not that much bigger for the common case where
> > the msglevel is omitted (and the 'if(...)' is optimized out).
>
> "NETIF_MSG_" is silly and should be eliminated.
>From this, I infer that you think that the option to "omit" the msglevel arg --
e.g.,
netdev_err(dev,, "NIC is fried!\n"); /* always logged */
-- is silly. No big deal. Its sole purpose is to help keep netdev_* calls terse.
> A separate "NETIF_MSG_ALL" test is not needed, because msg_enable is a
> bitmask. A msg_enable of 0xffffffff will naturally create a NETIF_MSG_ALL.
But how do you code a netdev_* call where you ALWAYS want the message (including
netdev_printk-style prefix) logged, regardless of the value of msg_enable? That's
what NETIF_MSG_ALL is for (and why it might be better called NETIF_MSG_ALWAYS)...
netdev_err(dev, ALL, "NIC is fried!\n"); /* always logged */
or
netdev_err(dev, ALWAYS, "NIC is fried!\n"); /* always logged */
>
> Also, whatever mechanism is created, it needs to preserve the feature of
> the existing system:
>
> if (a quick bitmask test)
> do something
>
> And preferably "do something" is not inlined, because printk'ing --
> although it may appear in a fast path during debugging -- cannot be
> considered a fast path itself.
>
> Jeff
Sorry, I'm not sure what you're getting at here. netdev_* doesn't prevent
people from using the existing netif_msg_* macros; it just provides shorthand
for the (usual) case where "do something" is "printk".
Jim
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-27 1:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-25 21:31 [PATCH 1/4] Net device error logging, revised Jim Keniston
2003-08-25 21:39 ` Subject: [PATCH 2/4] Net device error logging, revised (e100) Jim Keniston
2003-08-25 21:41 ` Subject: [PATCH 3/4] Net device error logging, revised (e1000) Jim Keniston
2003-08-25 21:43 ` [PATCH 4/4] Net device error logging, revised (tg3) Jim Keniston
2003-08-26 18:32 ` [PATCH 1/4] Net device error logging, revised Greg KH
2003-08-26 23:34 ` Jim Keniston
2003-08-26 23:51 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-08-27 1:07 ` Jim Keniston [this message]
2003-09-03 17:32 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-09-03 20:56 ` Jim Keniston
2003-08-27 1:06 ` Stephen Hemminger
2003-08-29 21:22 ` Jim Keniston
2003-09-15 23:08 ` [PATCH] " Jim Keniston
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F4C046D.77CF7E03@us.ibm.com \
--to=jkenisto@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=kessler@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=rddunlap@osdl.org \
--cc=scott.feldman@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).