From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jim Keniston Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Net device error logging, revised Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 18:07:57 -0700 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <3F4C046D.77CF7E03@us.ibm.com> References: <3F4A8027.6FE3F594@us.ibm.com> <20030826183221.GB3167@kroah.com> <3F4BEE68.A6C862C2@us.ibm.com> <3F4BF265.5050101@pobox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Greg KH , LKML , netdev , "Feldman, Scott" , Larry Kessler , Randy Dunlap , Alan Cox , Andrew Morton Return-path: To: Jeff Garzik Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Jeff Garzik wrote: > > Jim Keniston wrote: > > #define netdev_printk(sevlevel, netdev, msglevel, format, arg...) \ > > do { \ > > if (NETIF_MSG_##msglevel == NETIF_MSG_ALL || ((netdev)->msg_enable & NETIF_MSG_##msglevel)) { \ > > char pfx[40]; \ > > printk(sevlevel "%s: " format , make_netdev_msg_prefix(pfx, netdev) , ## arg); \ > > }} while (0) > > > > This would make your code bigger, but not that much bigger for the common case where > > the msglevel is omitted (and the 'if(...)' is optimized out). > > "NETIF_MSG_" is silly and should be eliminated. >>From this, I infer that you think that the option to "omit" the msglevel arg -- e.g., netdev_err(dev,, "NIC is fried!\n"); /* always logged */ -- is silly. No big deal. Its sole purpose is to help keep netdev_* calls terse. > A separate "NETIF_MSG_ALL" test is not needed, because msg_enable is a > bitmask. A msg_enable of 0xffffffff will naturally create a NETIF_MSG_ALL. But how do you code a netdev_* call where you ALWAYS want the message (including netdev_printk-style prefix) logged, regardless of the value of msg_enable? That's what NETIF_MSG_ALL is for (and why it might be better called NETIF_MSG_ALWAYS)... netdev_err(dev, ALL, "NIC is fried!\n"); /* always logged */ or netdev_err(dev, ALWAYS, "NIC is fried!\n"); /* always logged */ > > Also, whatever mechanism is created, it needs to preserve the feature of > the existing system: > > if (a quick bitmask test) > do something > > And preferably "do something" is not inlined, because printk'ing -- > although it may appear in a fast path during debugging -- cannot be > considered a fast path itself. > > Jeff Sorry, I'm not sure what you're getting at here. netdev_* doesn't prevent people from using the existing netif_msg_* macros; it just provides shorthand for the (usual) case where "do something" is "printk". Jim