From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: [bonding][2/3] Synchronizing 2.4-2.6 Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 17:26:37 -0400 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <3F51168D.1010306@pobox.com> References: <3F4E27A2.9060204@pobox.com> <200308302239.40237.shmulik.hen@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@oss.sgi.com Return-path: To: shmulik.hen@intel.com In-Reply-To: <200308302239.40237.shmulik.hen@intel.com> Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Shmulik Hen wrote: > On Thursday 28 August 2003 07:02 pm, Jeff Garzik wrote: > >>Hen, Shmulik wrote: >> >>>After patch set 1, It should be as easy as just copying all the >>>bonding related files from 2.4 to 2.6. I guess I can do that on >>>Sunday if someone hasn't already done it before. >> >>I had hoped to preserve the revision history. Simply copying the >>files over does not do that :( >> >>What I mean by preserving revision history is, changes should be >>submitted to 2.6 in the same granularity as they were to 2.4... >> > > > God, I wish I was an English speaking person... :( > Amir, on the other hand, understood exactly what you intended, so > there should be something ready for tomorrow that brings 2.6 to the > same point as 2.4 after set 1, in small steps. After that, sets 2 and > 3 could be applied the same way for 2.4 and 2.6. No worries. Even I don't understand myself sometimes. :) Jeff