From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: [PATCH]: fix skb_copy_expand offset calculation
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 18:21:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FAA832A.6000505@trash.net> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1383 bytes --]
Hi Dave,
this patch fixes offset calculation in skb_copy_expand.
head_copy_len = skb_headroom(skb);
head_copy_off = 0;
if (newheadroom < head_copy_len) {
head_copy_off = head_copy_len - newheadroom;
head_copy_len = newheadroom;
}
/* Copy the linear header and data. */
if (skb_copy_bits(skb, -head_copy_len, n->head + head_copy_off,
skb->len + head_copy_len))
It looks like it is intended to copy as much as possible, cutting off
bytes at the beginning is there is not enough room. For the case
newheadroom < head_copy_len that means it needs to copy newheadroom
bytes from skb->data - newheadroom to n->head, so head_copy_off
needs to be 0. I don't know how the data copied is used later on
but I assume it is intended to stay continous. That means in
the case that newheadroom > skb_headroom(skb) we need to copy
skb_headroom(skb) bytes to n->head + newheadroom - skb_headroom(skb),
so head_copy_off becomes newheadroom - head_copy_len.
In the patch the case newheadroom == skb_headroom(skb) is handled with
the first condition to save either a jump or a subtraction.
The patch is verified to fix the problem that led me to this, ipt_REJECT
produced broken RSTs which triggered the "ipt_hook: happy cracking!"
line in ip_conntrack_standalone.c.
Best regards,
Patrick
[-- Attachment #2: 2.6-skb_copy_expand.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1075 bytes --]
# This is a BitKeeper generated patch for the following project:
# Project Name: Linux kernel tree
# This patch format is intended for GNU patch command version 2.5 or higher.
# This patch includes the following deltas:
# ChangeSet 1.1413 -> 1.1414
# net/core/skbuff.c 1.32 -> 1.33
#
# The following is the BitKeeper ChangeSet Log
# --------------------------------------------
# 03/11/06 kaber@trash.net 1.1414
# Fix skb_copy_expand offset calculation
# --------------------------------------------
#
diff -Nru a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
--- a/net/core/skbuff.c Thu Nov 6 17:34:55 2003
+++ b/net/core/skbuff.c Thu Nov 6 17:34:55 2003
@@ -595,10 +595,10 @@
head_copy_len = skb_headroom(skb);
head_copy_off = 0;
- if (newheadroom < head_copy_len) {
- head_copy_off = head_copy_len - newheadroom;
+ if (newheadroom <= head_copy_len)
head_copy_len = newheadroom;
- }
+ else
+ head_copy_off = newheadroom - head_copy_len;
/* Copy the linear header and data. */
if (skb_copy_bits(skb, -head_copy_len, n->head + head_copy_off,
next reply other threads:[~2003-11-06 17:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-06 17:21 Patrick McHardy [this message]
2003-11-06 20:20 ` [PATCH]: fix skb_copy_expand offset calculation David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3FAA832A.6000505@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).