From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: Tigon3 5701 PCI-X recv performance problem Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 16:32:00 -0500 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <3FB15550.8020807@pobox.com> References: <3F844578.40306@sgi.com> <20031008101046.376abc3b.davem@redhat.com> <3F8455BE.8080300@sgi.com> <20031008183742.GA24822@wotan.suse.de> <20031008122223.1ba5ac79.davem@redhat.com> <20031008202248.GA15611@oldwotan.suse.de> <3F8702FF.70500@sgi.com> <20031010192036.GA31727@wotan.suse.de> <3F8802E6.5030601@sgi.com> <20031011131921.GC21763@wotan.suse.de> <20031011105054.0e16a607.davem@redhat.com> <3F8C290A.3010508@sgi.com> <20031014095323.71c8b9fe.davem@redhat.com> <3FB03A56.7000709@sgi.com> <20031110182911.2c5a121b.davem@redhat.com> <3FB140E2.1070007@sgi.com> <20031111122403.2d7bcf28.davem@redhat.com> <3FB153F1.8040708@sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "David S. Miller" , ak@suse.de, netdev@oss.sgi.com, jes@sgi.com Return-path: To: johnip@sgi.com In-Reply-To: <3FB153F1.8040708@sgi.com> Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org John Partridge wrote: > David S. Miller wrote: > >> On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 14:04:50 -0600 >> Why are you depending upon MCKINLEY? Don't all ia64 cpus >> give traps for unaligned memory accesses? > > > I have no evidence of a problem with Itanium1, only on Itanium2 (MCKINLEY) > I have seen it on HP and SGI MCKINLEY Ask the other David M about eepro100.c patches he wanted to send to me... Jeff