From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net [23.128.96.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0BE833E3 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 16:52:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sender4-op-o10.zoho.com (sender4-op-o10.zoho.com [136.143.188.10]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60B1D1BC0; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 09:52:20 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1686675089; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=g8sIDYZGereRM50ZTGnVkERCjlSLgS84Fc8GUN38DSdlYceqrjaIwy4rKt+fvySpwwlU6u/HzPz2pkkVC+SnbMyYzOOxFcg0YUm3PPt+wbX/mqLRTRgW1YaGBrveTEuyR5IHbKKoCRvb2N8rl6v1RWuJIC91Is49ahRtC2ds/VM= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1686675089; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To; bh=Y0/36EZqu1xosxR6JgPWMg2E2J6XN23PQ/8eX+lJwko=; b=h4nR4dK/1dIc8H4QcEdxgS9Bgx4F4eUElHUNwakx1ADRI96k9toJrKIQAxo7YLStwhkF6CLF6zvzKKJcLama7DcAQ+Y/C3x1ZPr3MaKR/zDHj2hIazfZbg2reRzj8mw2MgLeppDaJYUghmMdexWhEQDClH73zZKOU6WaNCb+kic= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=arinc9.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arinc.unal@arinc9.com; dmarc=pass header.from= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1686675089; s=zmail; d=arinc9.com; i=arinc.unal@arinc9.com; h=Message-ID:Date:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:Subject:To:To:Cc:Cc:References:From:From:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:Reply-To; bh=Y0/36EZqu1xosxR6JgPWMg2E2J6XN23PQ/8eX+lJwko=; b=FIjQSjg8/TvDzMpYU6IAzj8KOtwW5U9tZNHcHh2056qGMwnBGBnyvpDPlP9yICqY 4qZVCDNalgNNlILFleCo0IECcodNBkHheHAHHbj6lMinFzhwG1gs4el2KqmEv2RLuKJ MGwS6z5hLm1mz0efUH7pyA9/LfnqZil6zyt01hCw= Received: from [192.168.1.248] (178-147-169-233.haap.dm.cosmote.net [178.147.169.233]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1686675088239538.3959980724251; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 09:51:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3a8ff694-efdb-3ec0-c932-df681ef930cd@arinc9.com> Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2023 19:51:18 +0300 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4 0/7] net: dsa: mt7530: fix multiple CPU ports, BPDU and LLDP handling To: Andrew Lunn , "Russell King (Oracle)" Cc: Daniel Golle , Landen Chao , DENG Qingfang , Sean Wang , Florian Fainelli , Vladimir Oltean , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Matthias Brugger , AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , Frank Wunderlich , Bartel Eerdekens , mithat.guner@xeront.com, erkin.bozoglu@xeront.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org References: <20230612075945.16330-1-arinc.unal@arinc9.com> <66751af3-db5e-432a-859f-97e54c930e00@lunn.ch> Content-Language: en-US From: =?UTF-8?B?QXLEsW7DpyDDnE5BTA==?= In-Reply-To: <66751af3-db5e-432a-859f-97e54c930e00@lunn.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-ZohoMailClient: External X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net On 13.06.2023 00:30, Andrew Lunn wrote: > On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 09:52:29PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 12:37:29PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Please slow down your rate of patch submission - I haven't had a chance >>> to review the other patches yet (and I suspect no one else has.) Always >>> allow a bit of time for discussion. >>> >>> Just because you receive one comment doesn't mean you need to rush to >>> get a new series out. Give it at least a few days because there may be >>> further discussion of the points raised. >>> >>> Sending new versions quickly after previous comments significantly >>> increases reviewer workload. >> >> And a very illustratory point is that I responded with a follow up to >> your reply on v2, hadn't noticed that you'd sent v4, and the comments >> I subsequently made on v2 apply to v4... and I haven't even looked at >> v3 yet. > > Hi Arınç > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/maintainer-netdev.html#netdev-faq > > says: > > don't repost your patches within one 24h period > > 2.6.6. Resending after review¶ > > Allow at least 24 hours to pass between postings. This will ensure > reviewers from all geographical locations have a chance to chime > in. Do not wait too long (weeks) between postings either as it will > make it harder for reviewers to recall all the context. > > Make sure you address all the feedback in your new posting. Do not > post a new version of the code if the discussion about the previous > version is still ongoing, unless directly instructed by a reviewer. > > During a weekend, i would say 24 hours is way too short, and 3 days is > more like it, given that for a lot of people being a Maintainer is a > day job, 9-5 week days. > > You should also try to gauge how fast Maintainers are reacting. 24 > hours is often too fast. You know Russell is interested in these > patches, so don't send a new version until you actually get feedback > from him, and the discussion has come to a conclusion. Understood, thank you both for the kind warning. Arınç