From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
To: esben@geanix.com, Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@st.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@synopsys.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: net: snps,dwmac: Add time-based-scheduling property
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 10:19:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3adf7908-be27-4125-ae5b-6f2eb6100304@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87bk99hj7q.fsf@geanix.com>
On 25/01/2024 10:10, esben@geanix.com wrote:
> Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org> writes:
>
>> On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 03:33:06PM +0100, Esben Haabendal wrote:
>>> Time Based Scheduling can be enabled per TX queue, if supported by the
>>> controller.
>>
>> If time based scheduling is not supported by the controller, then the
>> property should not be present! The presence of a property like this
>> should mean that the feature is supported, using it is up to the
>> operating system.
>>
>> That said, why is this a property that should be in DT?
>
> It is added to the tx-queues-config object of snps,dwmac bindings. This
> entire object is about configuration of the ethernet controller, which
> is also what the purpose of the snps,time-based-scheduling.
> So yes, it is not specifically about describing what the hardware is
> capable of, but how the hardware is configured. It is a continuation of
> the current driver design.
>
>> If support is per controller is it not sufficient to use the
>> compatible to determine if this is supported?
>
> Are you suggesting to include the mapping from all supported compatible
> controllers to which TX queues supports TBS in the driver code? What
> would the benefit of that compared to describing it explicitly in the
> binding?
The benefit is complying with DT bindings rules, saying that bindings
describe hardware pieces, not drivers.
> And for the purpose of the above question, I am talking about it as if
> the binding was describing the hardware capability and not the
> configuration.
"if"? You wrote it is for driver design...
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-25 9:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-24 14:32 [PATCH 1/3] net: stmmac: do not clear TBS enable bit on link up/down Esben Haabendal
2024-01-24 14:33 ` [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: net: snps,dwmac: Add time-based-scheduling property Esben Haabendal
2024-01-24 16:07 ` Conor Dooley
2024-01-25 9:10 ` esben
2024-01-25 9:19 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2024-01-25 11:55 ` esben
2024-01-25 17:14 ` Conor Dooley
2024-01-30 21:39 ` Rob Herring
2024-01-31 7:31 ` Esben Haabendal
2024-01-24 14:33 ` [PATCH 3/3] net: stmmac: Time Based Scheduling support for OF platforms Esben Haabendal
2024-01-25 11:03 ` Kurt Kanzenbach
2024-01-25 11:58 ` esben
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3adf7908-be27-4125-ae5b-6f2eb6100304@linaro.org \
--to=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=esben@geanix.com \
--cc=joabreu@synopsys.com \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=peppe.cavallaro@st.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).