netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
To: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, dsahern@kernel.org,
	willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, willemb@google.com,
	ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
	eddyz87@gmail.com, song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
	john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me,
	haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, horms@kernel.org,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v7 05/13] net-timestamp: prepare for isolating two modes of SO_TIMESTAMPING
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2025 15:14:42 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3b3e0cdf-9c2b-4423-b638-0a79b238eb93@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250128084620.57547-6-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>

On 1/28/25 12:46 AM, Jason Xing wrote:
> No functional changes here. I add skb_enable_app_tstamp() to test
> if the orig_skb matches the usage of application SO_TIMESTAMPING
> and skb_sw_tstamp_tx() to distinguish the software and hardware

There is no skb_sw_tstamp_tx() in the code. An outdated commit message?

> timestamp when tsflag is SCM_TSTAMP_SND.
> 
> Also, I deliberately distinguish the the software and hardware
> SCM_TSTAMP_SND timestamp by passing 'sw' parameter in order to
> avoid such a case where hardware may go wrong and pass a NULL
> hwstamps, which is even though unlikely to happen. If it really
> happens, bpf prog will finally consider it as a software timestamp.
> It will be hardly recognized. Let's make the timestamping part
> more robust.
> 
> After this patch, I will soon add checks about bpf SO_TIMESTAMPING.

This needs to be updated also. BPF does not use the SO_TIMESTAMPING socket option.

> In this way, we can support two modes parallelly.

s/parallely/in parallel/

> 
> Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
> ---
>   include/linux/skbuff.h | 13 +++++++------
>   net/core/dev.c         |  2 +-
>   net/core/skbuff.c      | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>   net/ipv4/tcp_input.c   |  3 ++-
>   4 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h
> index bb2b751d274a..dfc419281cc9 100644
> --- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
> +++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
>   #include <net/net_debug.h>
>   #include <net/dropreason-core.h>
>   #include <net/netmem.h>
> +#include <uapi/linux/errqueue.h>
>   
>   /**
>    * DOC: skb checksums
> @@ -4533,18 +4534,18 @@ void skb_complete_tx_timestamp(struct sk_buff *skb,
>   
>   void __skb_tstamp_tx(struct sk_buff *orig_skb, const struct sk_buff *ack_skb,
>   		     struct skb_shared_hwtstamps *hwtstamps,
> -		     struct sock *sk, int tstype);
> +		     struct sock *sk, bool sw, int tstype);
>   
>   /**
> - * skb_tstamp_tx - queue clone of skb with send time stamps
> + * skb_tstamp_tx - queue clone of skb with send HARDWARE timestamps
>    * @orig_skb:	the original outgoing packet
>    * @hwtstamps:	hardware time stamps, may be NULL if not available
>    *
>    * If the skb has a socket associated, then this function clones the
>    * skb (thus sharing the actual data and optional structures), stores
> - * the optional hardware time stamping information (if non NULL) or
> - * generates a software time stamp (otherwise), then queues the clone

This line is removed. Does it mean no software timestamp now after this change?

> - * to the error queue of the socket.  Errors are silently ignored.
> + * the optional hardware time stamping information (if non NULL) then
> + * queues the clone to the error queue of the socket.  Errors are
> + * silently ignored.
>    */
>   void skb_tstamp_tx(struct sk_buff *orig_skb,
>   		   struct skb_shared_hwtstamps *hwtstamps);
> @@ -4565,7 +4566,7 @@ static inline void skb_tx_timestamp(struct sk_buff *skb)
>   {
>   	skb_clone_tx_timestamp(skb);
>   	if (skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_flags & SKBTX_SW_TSTAMP)
> -		skb_tstamp_tx(skb, NULL);
> +		__skb_tstamp_tx(skb, NULL, NULL, skb->sk, true, SCM_TSTAMP_SND);
>   }



  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-03 23:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-28  8:46 [PATCH bpf-next v7 00/13] net-timestamp: bpf extension to equip applications transparently Jason Xing
2025-01-28  8:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 01/13] net-timestamp: add support for bpf_setsockopt() Jason Xing
2025-01-28  8:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 02/13] net-timestamp: prepare for timestamping callbacks use Jason Xing
2025-01-28  8:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 03/13] bpf: stop unsafely accessing TCP fields in bpf callbacks Jason Xing
2025-01-28  8:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 04/13] bpf: stop calling some sock_op BPF CALLs in new timestamping callbacks Jason Xing
2025-01-28  8:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 05/13] net-timestamp: prepare for isolating two modes of SO_TIMESTAMPING Jason Xing
2025-02-03 23:14   ` Martin KaFai Lau [this message]
2025-02-04  0:18     ` Jason Xing
2025-01-28  8:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 06/13] net-timestamp: support SCM_TSTAMP_SCHED for bpf extension Jason Xing
2025-02-03 23:23   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-02-04  0:19     ` Jason Xing
2025-01-28  8:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 07/13] net-timestamp: support sw SCM_TSTAMP_SND " Jason Xing
2025-01-28  8:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 08/13] net-timestamp: support hw " Jason Xing
2025-02-04  0:56   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-02-04  1:13     ` Jason Xing
2025-01-28  8:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 09/13] net-timestamp: support SCM_TSTAMP_ACK " Jason Xing
2025-01-28  8:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 10/13] net-timestamp: make TCP tx timestamp bpf extension work Jason Xing
2025-02-04  1:03   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-02-04  1:15     ` Jason Xing
2025-01-28  8:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 11/13] net-timestamp: add a new callback in tcp_tx_timestamp() Jason Xing
2025-02-04  1:16   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-02-04  1:25     ` Jason Xing
2025-02-04 17:08       ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-04 18:09         ` Jason Xing
2025-02-05  3:05           ` Jason Xing
2025-02-05  5:13             ` Jason Xing
2025-02-05 15:20             ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-05 15:47               ` Jason Xing
2025-02-05 21:02                 ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-06  0:33                   ` Jason Xing
2025-02-06  3:00                     ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-06  4:03                       ` Jason Xing
2025-02-06 16:22                         ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-07  0:35                           ` Jason Xing
2025-01-28  8:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 12/13] net-timestamp: introduce cgroup lock to avoid affecting non-bpf cases Jason Xing
2025-02-04  1:21   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-02-04  1:25     ` Jason Xing
2025-01-28  8:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 13/13] bpf: add simple bpf tests in the tx path for so_timestamping feature Jason Xing
2025-02-04  2:02   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-02-04  5:32     ` Jason Xing
2025-02-04  2:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 00/13] net-timestamp: bpf extension to equip applications transparently Martin KaFai Lau
2025-02-04  2:44   ` Jason Xing
2025-02-04 17:11     ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-04 18:12       ` Jason Xing
2025-02-04 17:06   ` Willem de Bruijn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3b3e0cdf-9c2b-4423-b638-0a79b238eb93@linux.dev \
    --to=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    --cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).