From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
To: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
f.fainelli@gmail.com, andrew@lunn.ch, vivien.didelot@gmail.com,
linus.walleij@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 01/13] lib: Add support for generic packing operations
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 22:32:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3cd07aa5-02b0-c539-83f9-215d631dc1da@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190324190226.jr5cqxqflkfn4uvl@localhost>
On 3/24/19 9:02 PM, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 05:23:34AM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
>> This provides an unified API for accessing register bit fields
>> regardless of memory layout. The basic unit of data for these API
>> functions is the u64. The process of transforming an u64 from native CPU
>> encoding into the peripheral's encoding is called 'pack', and
>> transforming it from peripheral to native CPU encoding is 'unpack'.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/packing.txt | 150 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> MAINTAINERS | 8 ++
>> include/linux/packing.h | 49 +++++++++
>> lib/Makefile | 2 +-
>> lib/packing.c | 211 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> For this kind of generic infrastructure, you really should CC the lkml
> to get proper review.
>
> Thanks,
> Richard
>
Hi Richard,
I didn't want to pollute LKML with the entire driver patchset from the
get-go, just receive some initial feedback from netdev first (hence the
RFC).
How should I proceed? Should I resend just this patch to LKML, or a v2
patchset with LKML copied on the lib patch?
Thanks,
-Vladimir
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-24 20:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-24 3:23 [RFC PATCH net-next 00/13] NXP SJA1105 DSA driver Vladimir Oltean
2019-03-24 3:23 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 01/13] lib: Add support for generic packing operations Vladimir Oltean
2019-03-24 19:02 ` Richard Cochran
2019-03-24 20:32 ` Vladimir Oltean [this message]
2019-03-26 4:13 ` Richard Cochran
2019-03-24 3:23 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 02/13] net: dsa: Store vlan_filtering as a property of dsa_port Vladimir Oltean
2019-03-24 20:34 ` Andrew Lunn
2019-03-25 16:46 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-03-24 3:23 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 03/13] net: dsa: Create a more convenient function for installing port VLANs Vladimir Oltean
2019-03-25 17:06 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-03-27 0:31 ` Vladimir Oltean
2019-03-24 3:23 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 04/13] net: dsa: Call driver's setup callback after setting up its switchdev notifier Vladimir Oltean
2019-03-25 16:47 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-03-24 3:23 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 05/13] net: dsa: Optional VLAN-based port separation for switches without tagging Vladimir Oltean
2019-03-26 2:21 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-03-24 3:23 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 06/13] net: dsa: Introduce driver for NXP SJA1105 5-port L2 switch Vladimir Oltean
2019-03-26 13:02 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-03-26 17:52 ` Vladimir Oltean
2019-03-24 3:23 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 07/13] net: dsa: sja1105: Add support for FDB and MDB management Vladimir Oltean
2019-03-26 2:37 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-03-24 3:23 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 08/13] net: dsa: sja1105: Add support for VLAN operations Vladimir Oltean
2019-03-26 2:41 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-03-24 3:23 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 09/13] net: dsa: sja1105: Add support for ethtool port counters Vladimir Oltean
2019-03-26 2:44 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-03-24 3:23 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 10/13] net: dsa: sja1105: Add support for traffic through standalone ports Vladimir Oltean
2019-03-26 2:31 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-03-26 22:03 ` Vladimir Oltean
2019-03-26 22:13 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-03-26 22:38 ` Vladimir Oltean
2019-03-26 22:45 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-03-24 3:23 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 11/13] net: dsa: sja1105: Add support for Spanning Tree Protocol Vladimir Oltean
2019-03-24 3:23 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 12/13] Documentation: networking: dsa: Add details about NXP SJA1105 driver Vladimir Oltean
2019-03-26 2:34 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-03-24 3:23 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 13/13] dt-bindings: net: dsa: Add documentation for " Vladimir Oltean
2019-03-26 2:24 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-03-26 23:44 ` Vladimir Oltean
2019-03-25 16:31 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 00/13] NXP SJA1105 DSA driver Florian Fainelli
2019-03-26 17:30 ` Vinicius Costa Gomes
2019-03-26 18:07 ` Vladimir Oltean
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3cd07aa5-02b0-c539-83f9-215d631dc1da@gmail.com \
--to=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).