From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Andrew Gallatin" Subject: Re: [RFC 0/1] lro: Generic Large Receive Offload for TCP traffic Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 10:03:09 -0400 Message-ID: <3cea2ee30707210703p5865ef77j103eb9e7499dd95b@mail.gmail.com> References: <200707201741.45079.ossthema@de.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev , "Christoph Raisch" , "Jan-Bernd Themann" , linux-kernel , linux-ppc , "Marcus Eder" , "Thomas Klein" , "Stefan Roscher" , "David Miller" , "Jeff Garzik" , "Evgeniy Polyakov" To: "Jan-Bernd Themann" Return-path: Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.174]:49208 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1763345AbXGUODL (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jul 2007 10:03:11 -0400 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id j3so791636ugf for ; Sat, 21 Jul 2007 07:03:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <200707201741.45079.ossthema@de.ibm.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 7/20/07, Jan-Bernd Themann wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks a lot for your comments so far. > This generic LRO patch differs from the last one in several points. > A new interface for a "receive in pages" mode has been added and tested > with an eHEA prototype. Seems to work well. > > Does this extended interface seem to be sufficient? Thank you for this! At least for me, I find it is best to try to use an interface rather than simply reading a diff. So I will port Myri10GE to use the new interface so that I can give better feedback, I'll try my best to do this by early next week. Thank you again, Drew