netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
To: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com,
	andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, tj@kernel.org,
	martin.lau@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 2/7] bpf: Support associating BPF program with struct_ops
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2025 16:57:44 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3d44b770-6fca-4b8d-a650-2680a977d2b7@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251104172652.1746988-3-ameryhung@gmail.com>



On 11/4/25 9:26 AM, Amery Hung wrote:
> +void *bpf_prog_get_assoc_struct_ops(const struct bpf_prog_aux *aux)
> +{
> +	struct bpf_map *st_ops_assoc = READ_ONCE(aux->st_ops_assoc);
> +	struct bpf_struct_ops_map *st_map;
> +
> +	if (!st_ops_assoc || st_ops_assoc == BPF_PTR_POISON)
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	st_map = (struct bpf_struct_ops_map *)st_ops_assoc;
> +
> +	if (smp_load_acquire(&st_map->kvalue.common.state) == BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_INIT) {
> +		bpf_map_put(st_ops_assoc);

hmm... why bpf_map_put is needed?

Should the state be checked only once during assoc time instead of 
checking it every time bpf_prog_get_assoc_struct_ops is called?

> +		return NULL;
> +	}
> +
> +	return &st_map->kvalue.data;
> +}


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-11-06  0:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-04 17:26 [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/7] Support associating BPF programs with struct_ops Amery Hung
2025-11-04 17:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/7] bpf: Allow verifier to fixup kernel module kfuncs Amery Hung
2025-11-04 17:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 2/7] bpf: Support associating BPF program with struct_ops Amery Hung
2025-11-04 17:54   ` bot+bpf-ci
2025-11-04 18:03     ` Amery Hung
2025-11-04 21:59   ` Song Liu
2025-11-04 23:26     ` Amery Hung
2025-11-04 22:47   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-11-04 23:27     ` Amery Hung
2025-11-06  0:57   ` Martin KaFai Lau [this message]
2025-11-06  1:01     ` Amery Hung
2025-11-06  2:17       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-11-04 17:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 3/7] bpf: Pin associated struct_ops when registering async callback Amery Hung
2025-11-04 18:03   ` bot+bpf-ci
2025-11-04 18:10     ` Amery Hung
2025-11-04 23:20   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-11-05 23:03     ` Amery Hung
2025-11-06 16:54       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-11-06  2:13   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-11-06 17:57     ` Amery Hung
2025-11-06 19:37       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-11-04 17:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 4/7] libbpf: Add support for associating BPF program with struct_ops Amery Hung
2025-11-04 17:54   ` bot+bpf-ci
2025-11-04 23:27     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-11-04 23:26   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-11-04 23:39     ` Amery Hung
2025-11-05  0:46       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-11-04 17:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 5/7] selftests/bpf: Test BPF_PROG_ASSOC_STRUCT_OPS command Amery Hung
2025-11-04 17:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 6/7] selftests/bpf: Test ambiguous associated struct_ops Amery Hung
2025-11-04 17:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 7/7] selftests/bpf: Test getting associated struct_ops in timer callback Amery Hung

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3d44b770-6fca-4b8d-a650-2680a977d2b7@linux.dev \
    --to=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).