netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>,
	"eric.dumazet@gmail.com" <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 1/2] net: net-porcfs: Reduce rcu lock critical section
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 19:59:56 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3e0f5494-3d5c-06e8-a5b2-12b735390629@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1523490467.3587.20.camel@mellanox.com>



On 04/11/2018 04:47 PM, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> 
> Well if we allow devices to access HW counters via FW command
> interfaces in ndo_get_stats and by testing mlx5 where we query up to 5
> hw registers, it could take 100us, still this is way smaller than 10sec
>  :) and it is really a nice rate to fetch HW stats on demand.

If hardware stats are slower than software ones, maybe it is time to use software stats,
instead of changing the whole stack ?

There are very few devices drivers having issues like that.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-12  3:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-10 17:08 [RFC net-next 1/2] net: net-porcfs: Reduce rcu lock critical section Saeed Mahameed
2018-04-10 17:08 ` [RFC net-next 2/2] net: net-sysfs: Reduce netstat_show read_lock " Saeed Mahameed
2018-04-10 17:17   ` David Miller
2018-04-10 17:16 ` [RFC net-next 1/2] net: net-porcfs: Reduce rcu lock " David Miller
2018-04-10 20:35   ` Eric Dumazet
2018-04-11 18:59     ` Saeed Mahameed
2018-04-11 22:30       ` Eric Dumazet
2018-04-11 23:47         ` Saeed Mahameed
2018-04-12  2:59           ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2018-04-12 19:12             ` Saeed Mahameed
2018-04-16 20:50               ` Saeed Mahameed
2018-04-16 21:07                 ` Eric Dumazet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3e0f5494-3d5c-06e8-a5b2-12b735390629@gmail.com \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=saeedm@mellanox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).