From: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
To: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
edumazet@google.com, horms@kernel.org, paul@paul-moore.com,
petrm@nvidia.com, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/8] ipv4: icmp: Fix source IP derivation in presence of VRFs
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2025 20:37:05 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3e523601-88b5-4aba-bf90-916b87d73555@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250901083027.183468-4-idosch@nvidia.com>
On 9/1/25 2:30 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> When the "icmp_errors_use_inbound_ifaddr" sysctl is enabled, the source
> IP of ICMP error messages should be the "primary address of the
> interface that received the packet that caused the icmp error".
>
> The IPv4 ICMP code determines this interface using inet_iif() which in
> the input path translates to skb->skb_iif. If the interface that
> received the packet is a VRF port, skb->skb_iif will contain the ifindex
> of the VRF device and not that of the receiving interface. This is
> because in the input path the VRF driver overrides skb->skb_iif with the
> ifindex of the VRF device itself (see vrf_ip_rcv()).
>
> As such, the source IP that will be chosen for the ICMP error message is
> either an address assigned to the VRF device itself (if present) or an
> address assigned to some VRF port, not necessarily the input or output
> interface.
>
> This behavior is especially problematic when the error messages are
> "Time Exceeded" messages as it means that utilities like traceroute will
> show an incorrect packet path.
>
> Solve this by determining the input interface based on the iif field in
> the control block, if present. This field is set in the input path to
> skb->skb_iif and is not later overridden by the VRF driver, unlike
> skb->skb_iif.
>
> This behavior is consistent with the IPv6 counterpart that already uses
> the iif from the control block.
>
> Reported-by: Andy Roulin <aroulin@nvidia.com>
> Reported-by: Rajkumar Srinivasan <rajsrinivasa@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
> ---
> net/ipv4/icmp.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-02 2:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-01 8:30 [PATCH net-next 0/8] ipv4: icmp: Fix source IP derivation in presence of VRFs Ido Schimmel
2025-09-01 8:30 ` [PATCH net-next 1/8] ipv4: cipso: Simplify IP options handling in cipso_v4_error() Ido Schimmel
2025-09-02 2:36 ` David Ahern
2025-09-04 21:46 ` Paul Moore
2025-09-01 8:30 ` [PATCH net-next 2/8] ipv4: icmp: Pass IPv4 control block structure as an argument to __icmp_send() Ido Schimmel
2025-09-02 2:36 ` David Ahern
2025-09-01 8:30 ` [PATCH net-next 3/8] ipv4: icmp: Fix source IP derivation in presence of VRFs Ido Schimmel
2025-09-02 2:37 ` David Ahern [this message]
2025-09-01 8:30 ` [PATCH net-next 4/8] selftests: traceroute: Return correct value on failure Ido Schimmel
2025-09-02 2:37 ` David Ahern
2025-09-01 8:30 ` [PATCH net-next 5/8] selftests: traceroute: Use require_command() Ido Schimmel
2025-09-02 2:38 ` David Ahern
2025-09-01 8:30 ` [PATCH net-next 6/8] selftests: traceroute: Reword comment Ido Schimmel
2025-09-01 8:30 ` [PATCH net-next 7/8] selftests: traceroute: Test traceroute with different source IPs Ido Schimmel
2025-09-02 2:39 ` David Ahern
2025-09-01 8:30 ` [PATCH net-next 8/8] selftests: traceroute: Add VRF tests Ido Schimmel
2025-09-02 2:40 ` David Ahern
2025-09-01 8:40 ` [PATCH net-next 0/8] ipv4: icmp: Fix source IP derivation in presence of VRFs Ido Schimmel
2025-09-01 18:43 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3e523601-88b5-4aba-bf90-916b87d73555@kernel.org \
--to=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=petrm@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).