netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@kernel.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
	pabeni@redhat.com, paulmck@kernel.org, joel@joelfernandes.org,
	steven.price@arm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	anshuman.khandual@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] configs/debug: run and debug PREEMPT
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 13:58:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3f5ff26b-9904-462e-ac22-84b5d212e9ff@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250408120318.65125876@kernel.org>

Hi Jakub,

On 08/04/2025 21:03, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Apr 2025 20:18:26 +0200 Matthieu Baerts wrote:
>> On 02/04/2025 19:23, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
>>> Recent change [0] resulted in a "BUG: using __this_cpu_read() in
>>> preemptible" splat [1]. PREEMPT kernels have additional requirements
>>> on what can and can not run with/without preemption enabled.
>>> Expose those constrains in the debug kernels.  
>>
>> Good idea to suggest this to find more bugs!
>>
>> I did some quick tests on my side with our CI, and the MPTCP selftests
>> seem to take a bit more time, but without impacting the results.
>> Hopefully, there will be no impact in slower/busy environments :)
> 
> What kind of slow down do you see? I think we get up to 50% more time
> spent in the longer tests.

That's difficult to measure in our CI because we have a majority of
tests either creating test envs with random parameters (latency, losses,
etc.), or waiting for a transfer at a limited speed to finish. Plus, we
don't control the host running our tests. But if we omit that, our
packetdrill tests take ~20% longer on the CI, and our 2 mini KUnit tests
took ~10% longer (275ms -> 305ms). Globally, our test suite took maybe
~10-20% longer, and that's acceptable.

So not 50%. Is this difference acceptable for NIPA? Even when some tests
are restarted automatically in case of instabilities?

One last thing, Stanislav's patch has been shared during Linus' merge
window: perhaps something else could also impact the time?

> Not sure how bad is too bad..

Did you observe more instabilities? Maybe the individual results should
be omitted, and only debug specific issues (calltraces, kmemleak, etc.)
should be looked at?

> I'm leaning
> towards applying this to net-next and we can see if people running
> on linux-next complain?

Good idea! But I do wonder how run **and monitor** the selftests in
linux-next with a debug kernel :)

Cheers,
Matt
-- 
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.


  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-09 11:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-02 17:23 [PATCH net-next] configs/debug: run and debug PREEMPT Stanislav Fomichev
2025-04-04  9:32 ` Simon Horman
2025-04-08 18:18 ` Matthieu Baerts
2025-04-08 19:03   ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-09 11:58     ` Matthieu Baerts [this message]
2025-04-09 15:55       ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-10  1:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3f5ff26b-9904-462e-ac22-84b5d212e9ff@kernel.org \
    --to=matttbe@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=steven.price@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).