netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Raúl Hernández" <rauhersu@gmail.com>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org >> Linux Netdev List" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: QoS hot changes changes (tc)
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 08:21:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3f847c820906292321w1b85a423o2f5b25badddb9dd2@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A469242.4070000@gmail.com>

Thanks Jarek ! I will try to test them running traffic to see how they
are doing. I miss some documentation related to these stuff :-(.

Regards,
Raul

2009/6/27 Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>:
> Raúl Hernández wrote, On 06/26/2009 03:19 PM:
>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I am trying to characterize the situation in which we perform a change
>> in the shaping done by the Linux kernel (tc+qdisc), specifically when
>> modifying the bandwidth as a hot change while shaping with a previous
>> bw value. The system I am describing performs shaping per stream
>> (uplink and/or dowinlink or total), just marking the TOS of the ip
>> packet and provisioning the kernel via 'tc' to shape the packets.
>>
>> My question is whether someone has tried to modify bw parameters, ie:
>> move from 90 to 45 kb/s while the queues are already being populated
>> with trafffic .Do not know if the shaper algorithm is able to adjust
>> the bw without service disruption/experiment transitory behavior as I
>> guess the algorithm must have some kind of feedback which depends of
>> the bytes already shaped and the value of the bw itself (ie: leaky
>> bucket).
>>
>> Any experience with this kind of changes :-) ? Thx !
>
> No experience in measuring the effects of such changes, but looking
> into code shows it depends on a shaper algorithm: tbf seems to reset
> the queue, htb doesn't.
>
> Jarek P.
>



-- 
"We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand.

      reply	other threads:[~2009-06-30  6:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-26 13:19 QoS hot changes changes (tc) Raúl Hernández
2009-06-27 21:42 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-30  6:21   ` Raúl Hernández [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3f847c820906292321w1b85a423o2f5b25badddb9dd2@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=rauhersu@gmail.com \
    --cc=jarkao2@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).