Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rao, Nikhil" <nikhirao@amd.com>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"Nikhil P. Rao" <nikhil.rao@amd.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kuba@kernel.org, brett.creeley@amd.com, eric.joyner@amd.com,
	andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 2/2] pds_core: fix use-after-free on workqueue during remove
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2026 11:29:21 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3fb21caf-c9f8-4218-8c14-8192a71f26f2@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11c0ee2b-96ff-4e27-8688-485dc4605f58@redhat.com>

On 7/2/2026 1:13 AM, Paolo Abeni wrote:> On 6/29/26 10:03 PM, Nikhil P. 
Rao wrote:
 >> In pdsc_remove(), the workqueue is destroyed before pdsc_teardown()
 >> is called. This ordering allows two paths to queue work on the
 >> destroyed workqueue:
 >>
 >> 1. If pdsc_teardown() -> pdsc_devcmd_reset() times out, the error
 >>     path in pdsc_devcmd_locked() queues health_work.
 >>
 >> 2. A NotifyQ event can trigger the ISR and queue work before free_irq()
 >>     is called in pdsc_teardown().
 >
 > I think this should be 2 separate patches.

Thanks for the review.

The original combined them because moving destroy_workqueue() after 
teardown fixed both issues.

But they can be split:

- Patch 1: Set pdsc->wq = NULL before destroying it (fixes issue 1). The 
devcmd error path checks pdsc->wq before queuing, so this prevents the 
UAF. Also avoids needless health recovery during remove.

- Patch 2: Move destroy_workqueue() after teardown and add 
cancel_work_sync() (fixes issue 2).

Combined, it looks like this:

struct workqueue_struct *wq = pdsc->wq;
if (wq)
    pdsc->wq = NULL;

/* teardown (free IRQ, cancel work, free memory) */

if (wq)
     destroy_workqueue(wq);

 >
 >> @@ -121,10 +122,16 @@ void pdsc_process_adminq(struct pdsc_qcq *qcq)
 >>        qcq->accum_work += aq_work;
 >>
 >>   credits:
 >> -     /* Return the interrupt credits, one for each completion */
 >> -     pds_core_intr_credits(&pdsc->intr_ctrl[qcq->intx],
 >> -                           nq_work + aq_work,
 >> -                           PDS_CORE_INTR_CRED_REARM);
 >> +     /* Return the interrupt credits, one for each completion.
 >> +      * Use READ_ONCE to get a single consistent copy of intx since 
it can
 >> +      * be set to PDS_CORE_INTR_INDEX_NOT_ASSIGNED concurrently during
 >> +      * teardown, and skip the credits if so.
 >> +      */
 >> +     intx = READ_ONCE(qcq->intx);
 >> +     if (intx != PDS_CORE_INTR_INDEX_NOT_ASSIGNED)
 >> +             pds_core_intr_credits(&pdsc->intr_ctrl[intx],
 >> +                                   nq_work + aq_work,
 >> +                                   PDS_CORE_INTR_CRED_REARM);
 > AFAICS this does not look safe.
 >
 > A concurrent pdsc_qcq_free()/pdsc_qcq_intr_free() may free
 > `pdsc->intr_ctrl` before setting PDS_CORE_INTR_INDEX_NOT_ASSIGNED.
 >
 > I think the teardown should:
 >
 > - disable the IRQ
 > - cancel the work
 > - free the structs
 > in the above sequence.

pdsc_qcq_intr_free() doesn't free intr_ctrl - it only calls free_irq(). 
intr_ctrl is BAR-mapped memory, freed later by pdsc_unmap_bars() after 
teardown completes.

The sequence is already as suggested above:

pdsc_qcq_free()
- pdsc_qcq_intr_free() /* calls pdsc_intr_free->free_irq() */
- cancel_work_sync()
- Frees DMA memory and structs

Note: the adminqcq ISR handles both adminq completions and notifyq 
events, so notifyq struct is freed second.

In the current code, qcq->intx is set to NOT_ASSIGNED in 
pdsc_qcq_intr_free(). Moving this to after cancel_work_sync() removes 
the need for READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE.

Please let me know if the proposed split works, I will include it in v3 
with the change above

Nikhil

      reply	other threads:[~2026-07-06 18:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-29 20:03 [PATCH net v2 0/2] pds_core: fix use-after-free on workqueue during remove Nikhil P. Rao
2026-06-29 20:03 ` [PATCH net v2 1/2] pds_core: fix deadlock between reset thread and remove Nikhil P. Rao
2026-06-29 21:30   ` Harshitha Ramamurthy
2026-06-29 20:03 ` [PATCH net v2 2/2] pds_core: fix use-after-free on workqueue during remove Nikhil P. Rao
2026-06-29 21:32   ` Harshitha Ramamurthy
2026-06-29 23:42     ` Rao, Nikhil
2026-07-02  8:13   ` Paolo Abeni
2026-07-06 18:29     ` Rao, Nikhil [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3fb21caf-c9f8-4218-8c14-8192a71f26f2@amd.com \
    --to=nikhirao@amd.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=brett.creeley@amd.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=eric.joyner@amd.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nikhil.rao@amd.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox