From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>,
"'netdev@oss.sgi.com'" <netdev@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] support for large number of network devices.
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 17:55:32 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4004A194.3030602@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040113163828.64ec4743.shemminger@osdl.org>
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:23:25 -0800
> Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>>
>>>When using pseudo network devices, and really big machines; there is
>>>sometimes a need to have a lot of network devices. This replaces the
>>>existing 2.6.1 limit of 100 entries an was O(n^2)
>>>with a algorithm that will handle up to 32768 entries with O(n) behaviour.
>>
>>Might be a good time to put in hash tables to find network devices by
>>name and by device-id. There are a few parts of the networking stack
>>that do lookups, and walking the device list when it's 4k entries
>>long takes a while...
>
>
> I have a patch for name hashing, but don't know if it's needed.
> Even without it I can add 9 thousand bridge entries,
> and each one takes longer to start the command than add the entry now.
Check out the af_packet code. At least some branches do a
device lookup by name for each transmitted packet. One
method is: packet_sendmsg_spkt
packet_sendmsg gets by index, which could also be hashed...
At one time ifconfig -a was almost un-usable with large numbers
of devices, but I think it has been improved. I haven't tried on
large numbers of devices lately...
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-14 1:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-13 23:46 [PATCH] support for large number of network devices Stephen Hemminger
2004-01-13 23:59 ` David S. Miller
2004-01-14 0:13 ` Stephen Hemminger
2004-01-14 7:13 ` Matt Mackall
2004-01-14 19:37 ` Stephen Hemminger
2004-01-14 19:51 ` Matt Mackall
2004-01-14 20:11 ` David S. Miller
2004-01-15 0:24 ` Stephen Hemminger
2004-01-15 8:46 ` David S. Miller
2004-01-15 17:52 ` Stephen Hemminger
2004-01-15 19:40 ` David S. Miller
2004-01-14 0:23 ` Ben Greear
2004-01-14 0:38 ` Stephen Hemminger
2004-01-14 1:55 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2004-01-14 7:18 ` David S. Miller
2004-01-14 7:54 ` Ben Greear
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-01-14 21:39 Jean Tourrilhes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4004A194.3030602@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).