From: "Mika Penttilä" <mika.penttila@kolumbus.fi>
To: James Morris <jmorris@redhat.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>,
Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org>,
netdev@oss.sgi.com, Stephen Smalley <sds@epoch.ncsc.mil>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix checksum bug for multicast/broadcast packets on postrouting hook
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 11:34:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <402F3D1E.2020005@kolumbus.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Xine.LNX.4.44.0402142314580.7364-100000@thoron.boston.redhat.com>
James Morris wrote:
>On Sat, 14 Feb 2004, Mika Penttilä wrote:
>
>
>
>>James Morris wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>The proposed solution below is to copy the skb rather than clone it, to
>>>ensure that the original and looped back packets are independent.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>This is unneeded overhead for the common case. The right fix is to make
>>sure the modifier (netfilter etc) makes the copy if needed. Actually,
>>this is what skb_ip_make_writable() is doing.
>>
>>
>
>The common case here will be only for locally generated multicast and
>broadcast packets.
>
>If the netfilter core code is modified instead, we will end up adding
>skb_ip_make_writable() to nf_hook_slow() which will be called for every
>packet with an output device which uses hardware checksums.
>
>Not sure which is worse, but here's a proposed patch which does this.
>
>
>- James
>
I don't see the context here. Where is the packet mangled? Why isn't
that instance doing skb_ip_make_writable()? selinux? Not everyone
generating locally multicast/broadcast packets is using selinux...
--Mika
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-15 9:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-14 18:37 [PATCH] Fix checksum bug for multicast/broadcast packets on postrouting hook James Morris
2004-02-14 18:37 ` Harald Welte
2004-02-14 19:07 ` Mika Penttilä
2004-02-14 23:00 ` David S. Miller
2004-02-15 6:09 ` James Morris
2004-02-15 9:34 ` Mika Penttilä [this message]
2004-02-15 13:03 ` James Morris
2004-02-15 13:40 ` Mika Penttilä
2004-02-15 14:03 ` James Morris
2004-02-15 16:00 ` Mika Penttilä
2004-02-16 1:50 ` James Morris
2004-02-16 6:43 ` Mika Penttilä
2004-02-16 13:45 ` James Morris
2004-02-19 1:24 ` David S. Miller
2004-02-23 22:19 ` James Morris
2004-02-29 5:50 ` David S. Miller
2004-02-17 15:54 ` Harald Welte
2004-02-17 20:35 ` James Morris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=402F3D1E.2020005@kolumbus.fi \
--to=mika.penttila@kolumbus.fi \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=jmorris@redhat.com \
--cc=laforge@netfilter.org \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=sds@epoch.ncsc.mil \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).