netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Leonid Grossman <leonid.grossman@s2io.com>
Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com, "'Andi Kleen'" <ak@suse.de>,
	"'Stephen Hemminger'" <shemminger@osdl.org>,
	"'Francois Romieu'" <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>,
	"'jamal'" <hadi@cyberus.ca>, "'Grant Grundler'" <iod00d@hp.com>,
	"'Anton Blanchard'" <anton@samba.org>,
	"'Jes Sorensen'" <jes@trained-monkey.org>,
	raghavendra.koushik@s2io.com,
	"'ravinandan arakali'" <ravinandan.arakali@s2io.com>
Subject: Re: Submission for S2io 10GbE driver
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 17:12:40 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <40314058.2000307@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000201c3f4d2$2a5ddd90$7410100a@S2IOtech.com>

Leonid Grossman wrote:
> 1. At the moment, lspci output looks like
> "02:02.0 Ethernet controller: Unknown device 17d5:5831 (rev 02)"; do we
> need to submit a patch for drivers/pci/pci.ids?

http://pciids.sourceforge.net/

The file drivers/pci/pci.ids is only associated with /proc/pci strings, 
and I'm trying to deprecate it :)


> 2. The card fully supports Ethernet and TCP header separation in
> hardware (so called receive 3-buffer mode).
> The mode may have some performance advantages but so far we did not
> implement the mode in Linux since it seems that Linux stack can't handle
> the fragmented buffers in the receive path. Is this a correct
> assumption, does receive buffer has to be continuous?

In theory, the skb can be fragmented.  I'm not as much as an expert in 
the ipv4/tcp/socket levels of the net stack, but I don't recall any 
place that yet supports skb frags on receive?

I think that's likely an area that would need some minor 
adjustments/additions in the upstream kernels, but not major surgery, 
since the skb already supports creating, noticing, and freeing frags.

	Jeff

  reply	other threads:[~2004-02-16 22:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-01-23 21:22 FW: Submission for S2io 10GbE driver Leonid Grossman
2004-01-23 21:54 ` Stephen Hemminger
2004-01-23 21:58   ` Leonid Grossman
2004-01-23 22:22 ` FW: " Andi Kleen
2004-01-24  0:21   ` Stephen Hemminger
2004-01-27  5:32     ` Leonid Grossman
2004-01-27  6:08       ` Jeff Garzik
2004-01-27  6:19         ` Leonid Grossman
2004-02-04 20:44   ` FW: " Leonid Grossman
2004-02-05  0:49     ` Grant Grundler
2004-02-05  1:14       ` Leonid Grossman
2004-02-16 21:16       ` Leonid Grossman
2004-02-16 22:12         ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2004-02-16 23:53           ` Leonid Grossman
2004-02-17  0:11         ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-17  0:16           ` Stephen Hemminger
2004-02-28 15:08           ` Submission #3 " Leonid Grossman
2004-02-28 20:21             ` Jeff Garzik
2004-03-12 21:55               ` ravinandan arakali
2004-03-13  2:30                 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-03-20  4:35               ` Submission #4 " Leonid Grossman
2004-03-20  9:56                 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-03-20 10:00                   ` Jeff Garzik
2004-03-22 19:36                     ` ravinandan arakali
2004-03-22 19:43                       ` Jeff Garzik
2004-03-20 10:48                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-05  1:32     ` FW: Submission " Andi Kleen
2004-02-05  1:51       ` Anton Blanchard
2004-02-05  2:46         ` Leonid Grossman
2004-02-05  3:25           ` Anton Blanchard
2004-02-05  9:27             ` Jeff Garzik
2004-02-05  9:29           ` Jeff Garzik
2004-02-05 22:09             ` Leonid Grossman
2004-02-05 22:34               ` Grant Grundler
2004-02-05 23:23                 ` Jes Sorensen
2004-01-24  0:38 ` Francois Romieu
2004-01-24  3:14 ` jamal
2004-01-24  5:10   ` Leonid Grossman
2004-01-24 14:58     ` Andi Kleen
2004-01-24 17:54       ` jamal
2004-01-24 19:52         ` Leonid Grossman
2004-01-25 19:07           ` jamal
2004-01-25 17:56       ` Leonid Grossman
2004-01-24 18:00     ` jamal
2004-01-24 20:04       ` Leonid Grossman
2004-01-25 19:14         ` jamal
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-19  7:16 raghavendra.koushik
2004-02-19  8:14 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-02-20  2:33   ` ravinandan arakali
     [not found] <403573B5.4050100@pobox.com>
2004-02-20  2:59 ` ravinandan arakali
2004-02-20  3:30   ` Jeff Garzik
2004-02-25  6:03 raghavendra.koushik
2004-02-26  7:40 ` Jeff Garzik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=40314058.2000307@pobox.com \
    --to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
    --cc=iod00d@hp.com \
    --cc=jes@trained-monkey.org \
    --cc=leonid.grossman@s2io.com \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=raghavendra.koushik@s2io.com \
    --cc=ravinandan.arakali@s2io.com \
    --cc=romieu@fr.zoreil.com \
    --cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).