David S. Miller wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 11:30:05 +0100
> Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> wrote:
> 
> 
>>I guess he meant something like this, but I still think it encourages
>>broken configurations in combination with non-work-conserving
>>schedulers.
> 
> 
> Patrick, "(x || 1)" is not the same as "(x ? x : 1)"
> :-)

Doh! I must have been programming in perl before .. ;)

> 
> Please make a new patch.
> 

Attached.

Regards
Patrick