From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: "Feldman, Scott" <scott.feldman@intel.com>
Cc: raghavendra.koushik@wipro.com, leonid.grossman@s2io.com,
netdev@oss.sgi.com, shemminger@osdl.org, hch@infradead.org,
ravinandan.arakali@s2io.com, raghavendra.koushik@s2io.com
Subject: Re: Submission #3 for S2io 10GbE driver
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 16:21:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4044FABE.9070408@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C6F5CF431189FA4CBAEC9E7DD5441E0102CBDECB@orsmsx402.jf.intel.com>
Feldman, Scott wrote:
>>This is incorrect, and definitely an issue that needs to be addressed.
>>
>>As I said, the model is, the driver calls netif_stop_queue() after
>>queueing a packet, when it knows there is no more room for a full
>>packet. The tg3 driver does it like this:
>>
>> ...queue an skb to hardware...
>> if (TX_BUFFS_AVAIL(tp) <= (MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1))
>> netif_stop_queue(dev);
>>
>>Therefore you guarantee the queue is stopped until you are
>>100% certain that another skb (up to MAX_SKB_FRAGS + "main frag"
>>fragments) may be queued to hardware.
>>
>>You do -not- want to figure out "after the fact" that you
>>cannot queue the skb you were just passed.
>
>
> But tg3 checks this case also and returns 1:
>
> /* This is a hard error, log it. */
> if (unlikely(TX_BUFFS_AVAIL(tp) <= (skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags +
> 1))) {
> netif_stop_queue(dev);
> ...
> return 1;
> }
>
> Does this code path happen?
You snipped the important
printk(KERN_ERR PFX "%s: BUG! Tx Ring full when queue
awake!\n",
dev->name);
It's a BUG because it should never happen.
tg3 needs to kfree the skb too, leading to my comment "some existing
drivers get this wrong too". Requeueing the skb only occurs in -some-
packet schedulers, not all. So drivers cannot depend on the net stack
doing what you want in all cases. Conditional correct behavior or
leak.. :/
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-02 21:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-02 21:16 Submission #3 for S2io 10GbE driver Feldman, Scott
2004-03-02 21:21 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2004-03-02 21:33 ` Ben Greear
2004-03-02 21:38 ` Jeff Garzik
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-03-02 21:47 Feldman, Scott
2004-03-02 22:21 ` Ben Greear
2004-03-02 13:46 raghavendra.koushik
2004-03-02 18:47 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-03-01 13:05 raghavendra.koushik
2004-03-01 15:24 ` Leonid Grossman
2004-03-01 6:21 raghavendra.koushik
2004-03-01 6:53 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-02-17 0:11 Submission " Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-28 15:08 ` Submission #3 " Leonid Grossman
2004-02-28 20:21 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-03-12 21:55 ` ravinandan arakali
2004-03-13 2:30 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4044FABE.9070408@pobox.com \
--to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=leonid.grossman@s2io.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=raghavendra.koushik@s2io.com \
--cc=raghavendra.koushik@wipro.com \
--cc=ravinandan.arakali@s2io.com \
--cc=scott.feldman@intel.com \
--cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).