Xeon smp performance

Xeon smp performance

[satya srikanth]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii, Size: 915 bytes --]

Hi,
   I am writing a simple sniffer program that will
sniff packets in a gigabit network. I am using a dual
processor 2 GHz Xeon processor with one Intel Pro-1000
desktop adapter, running 2.4.20-8smp linux. 
   I found that for all packet sizes and network
bandwidth, 2.4.20-8 uniprocessor version that uses
only one processor is performing better than
2.4.20-8smp using two processors in terms of packet
drops and CPU utilization. Each processor in smp is
utilizing more CPU than one processor in uni-processor
case. What is the reason for this peculiar behaviour?
Is it possible for me to use the power of second
processor without adding more NICs. Will I face
similar problems with 2.6 also? Anybody familiar with
these please help me out.

TIA
Satya Srikanth

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search - Find what you’re looking for faster
http://search.yahoo.com

Re: Xeon smp performance

[P]

satya srikanth wrote:
> Hi,
>    I am writing a simple sniffer program that will
> sniff packets in a gigabit network. I am using a dual
> processor 2 GHz Xeon processor with one Intel Pro-1000
> desktop adapter, running 2.4.20-8smp linux. 
>    I found that for all packet sizes and network
> bandwidth, 2.4.20-8 uniprocessor version that uses
> only one processor is performing better than
> 2.4.20-8smp using two processors in terms of packet
> drops and CPU utilization. Each processor in smp is
> utilizing more CPU than one processor in uni-processor
> case. What is the reason for this peculiar behaviour?
> Is it possible for me to use the power of second
> processor without adding more NICs. Will I face
> similar problems with 2.6 also? Anybody familiar with
> these please help me out.

That matches my experience. My chipset was Intel E7501
with 2 intel pro-1000 adapters. I used the base 2.4.20 kernel
with latest intel drivers.

I had 2 processes capturing packets and noticed that
2 CPUs is 7% slower than one CPU. Note I was using a non SMP
kernel for the one CPU case.

I'm going to have to look into improving this soon.
First I'm going to look at IRQ and process affinity.

Pádraig.