From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: James Ketrenos <jketreno@linux.co.intel.com>
Cc: Netdev <netdev@oss.sgi.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: Centrino wireless review
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 21:47:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <404E81DF.9020400@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <404E795A.9050906@linux.co.intel.com>
James Ketrenos wrote:
> Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
>>
>> Thanks much to you and Intel for publishing this!
>
>
> Wow. Quick review turn around :)
I've been hoping a Centrino wireless driver would appear for a while now ;-)
>> 0) is the firmware blob truly a firmware blob, and not an x86 ELF
>> blob? In other words, will this firmware work on non-x86?
>
>
> The firmware data is just loaded from disk and handed off to the ipw2100
> hardware; no linking with the kernel or running on the CPU. To make
> firmware loader work on an architecture w/ endian issues would require
> some tweaks, but the firmware image itself wouldn't change (none of it
> is executed by the CPU)
>
> Or am I missing what you're asking?
Nope, that answered my question. Thanks.
>> 24) I don't see that you need to list all 1001 (or so:)) PCI subsystem
>> vendor ids... just list the PCI vendor and device id. (unless I'm
>> missing something?)
>
>
> Apparently we have other cards that match the PCI vendor and device, but
> are not IPW 2100[A]s, so the subsystem ids had to be added.
Sigh.
>> 26) I'm curious, what is the locking/exclusion on the ipw2100_wx_xxx()
>> functions?
>
>
> Locking is lacking in a few places in the wx code. Any data that needs
> to be protected will end up being wrapped with the priv->low_lock
> spinlock. Is there something you saw in how we have it that might be
> problematic?
In general I saw a lack of locking in the wx module, but I admit I could
have missed these low_lock uses.
jeff
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-10 2:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-09 21:57 Centrino wireless review Jeff Garzik
[not found] ` <404E795A.9050906@linux.co.intel.com>
2004-03-10 2:47 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=404E81DF.9020400@pobox.com \
--to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=jketreno@linux.co.intel.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).