From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: jt@hpl.hp.com
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>,
netdev@oss.sgi.com,
Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6] Intersil Prism54 wireless driver
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 12:58:28 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <404F5744.1040201@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040310175200.GA9531@bougret.hpl.hp.com>
Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
> You misunderstood. The HostAP driver has a pretty much
> complete generic 802.11 stack. However, other driver can't depend on
> that code until it's in the kernel.
> By "big 802.11 reorg", I meant "make the other driver depend
> on HostAP 802.11 code".
> Of course, I'm quite partial to the HostAP code because I'm
> more familiar with it and I believe it's the most advanced (host WEP,
> 802.1x, WPA, AP...). Other candidated are linux-wlan-ng or the *BSD
> stack (by the way of the MadWifi driver).
Ah! I did indeed misunderstand.
Yes, it would be good to end the cycle of re-implementing 802.11 over
and over again ;-)
So here is my suggested plan:
* I merge prism54 upstream
* I create wireless-2.6 queue
* somebody (you, Jouni(sp?)) submits HostAP to me
* I merge HostAP
* submit rtnetlink patches to me
* start working on generic 802.11 stack in wireless-2.6 queue
* at the same time, migrate away from iw_handler to "wireless_ops" (i.e.
something like ethtool_ops)
* once things have stabilized again, merge upstream
I'm not sure about the order of the last few steps, you know better than
I what dependencies exist.
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-10 17:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-04 2:35 [PATCH 2.6] Intersil Prism54 wireless driver Jean Tourrilhes
2004-03-04 2:37 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-03-04 2:49 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2004-03-10 3:24 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2004-03-10 7:12 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-03-10 17:21 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2004-03-10 16:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-03-10 17:21 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2004-03-10 17:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-03-10 17:29 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-03-10 17:52 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2004-03-10 17:58 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2004-03-10 23:37 ` James Ketrenos
2004-03-11 2:31 ` Jouni Malinen
2004-03-11 2:43 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-03-15 22:18 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-15 22:44 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-03-15 22:55 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2004-03-11 2:48 ` Jouni Malinen
2004-03-11 3:02 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-03-11 3:17 ` Jouni Malinen
2004-03-11 16:28 ` Device naming for wireless NICs James Ketrenos
2004-03-11 16:36 ` Tomasz Torcz
2004-03-11 16:54 ` Matthew Galgoci
2004-03-11 18:25 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-03-11 18:23 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-03-12 10:30 ` P
2004-03-10 18:07 ` [PATCH 2.6] Intersil Prism54 wireless driver Jeff Garzik
2004-03-11 2:21 ` Jouni Malinen
2004-03-10 22:17 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=404F5744.1040201@pobox.com \
--to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jt@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).