netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Munck Steenholdt <tmus@tmus.dk>
To: jt@hpl.hp.com, hermes@gibson.dropbear.id.au
Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.6.3 orinoco.c patch to support ethtool get_link
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 19:49:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4052063F.9020107@tmus.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <404E4159.9040404@tmus.dk>

Thomas Munck Steenholdt wrote:
> Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
> 
>>     I hope you realise that most often link status is meaningless
>> with Wireless cards. In Ad-Hoc mode, the link is always up, regardless
>> of the number of nodes in the cell, check the discussion on the HostAP
>> mailing list. And the Orinoco card will report connected even is WEP
>> is wrong. But, if you only use managed mode without WEP, that should
>> work.
>>     I just wonder if it's better to report a 'link status' that
>> may be wrong/misleading or to not report anything at all.
> 
> 
> Actually, if the WEP key is wrong(i guess that's what you mean) the
> link is determined as down, like it should be!
> 
> For the AdHoc mode, sure the link is always determined as up, but that
> is really the best way to do it given the nature of an Ad-Hoc network,
> right!
> 
> The way I see it you'll gain from this patch whenever in managed mode.
> Most people (in my experience) is using managed mode and thus would 
> benefit from this functionality!
> 
> Thomas
> 
> 

Please comment on this ?

I feel it's a really good idea that would improve things for me a lot - 
I'm sure I'm not the only one!

Thomas

  reply	other threads:[~2004-03-12 18:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-03-08 18:52 [PATCH] 2.6.3 orinoco.c patch to support ethtool get_link Jean Tourrilhes
2004-03-09 22:12 ` Thomas Munck Steenholdt
2004-03-12 18:49   ` Thomas Munck Steenholdt [this message]
2004-03-12 18:53     ` Jean Tourrilhes
2004-03-16  0:14     ` David Gibson
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-03-07  1:49 Thomas Munck Steenholdt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4052063F.9020107@tmus.dk \
    --to=tmus@tmus.dk \
    --cc=hermes@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=jt@hpl.hp.com \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).