From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@studorgs.rutgers.edu>
Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@studorgs.rutgers.edu>,
Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
prism54-devel@prism54.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com,
jgarzik@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Prism54-devel] Re: Prism54 in 2.6.4-bk2
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 02:01:16 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4056A63C.50808@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040316064758.GI24063@ruslug.rutgers.edu>
Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 01:14:35AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
>>Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>>
>>>Regarding WDS on prism54: on the netdev list we discussed this
>>>but no one got back to me as to whether we should really just nuke this
>>>code. Prism54 driver source *does* include WDS support because hey, the
>>>firmware does. Why wouldn't it go in the driver? We haven't given WDS
>>>much though anyway since it's also been low priority on our TODO list.
>>
>>The WDS code was dead code as merged.
>>
>>If you actually use it, I don't mind adding it :)
>
>
> I don't know of anybody who uses it. We did consider to drop it but we
> just never got around to deciding what we were going to do about it. I
> know it's there and it's *supposed* to work.
>
> Can we get back to you on that? :) It is just code that *is*
> driver/hardware specific.
For code is that (a) experimental, (b) for pre-production hardware, or
(c) rarely if ever used, we would prefer to not merge it at all.
When I see stuff like "TODO: actually give this some thought" and "I
don't know anybody who uses it", that means it doesn't need to be merged
in the upstream tree :)
> Actually can I just send you a patch for 2.6 for the latest 2.6 tree to
> match ours? That is, rm -rf prism54/ as is and add our latest patch ?
> It'd save a lot of work on our end.
It depends on how big the patch is, and whether or not it adds code that
nobody but the dev team uses, etc... I don't want to add the WDS code,
since nobody uses it... and adding the #ifdefs I removed would not be
desired either. Those #ifdefs aren't need in the upstream tree. I plan
to remove them from other upstream drivers, too.
WRT submitting patches... send away. drivers/net patches should go ->
Jean T -> jgarzik+netdev or simply -> jgarzik+netdev, your choice. In
general "50 small patches are better than 1 big patch". Large updates
are not reviewable or easily testable. Large patches tend to fix 20
bugs, and add 5 new ones.
Jeff
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-16 7:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <5.1.0.14.2.20040313180709.00ab4250@pop.t-online.de>
[not found] ` <1079199572.7111.0.camel@lapy.tuxslare.org>
[not found] ` <20040313203058.GY32439@ruslug.rutgers.edu>
2004-03-13 22:15 ` Prism54 in 2.6.4-bk2 Luis R. Rodriguez
2004-03-16 6:14 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-03-16 6:47 ` [Prism54-devel] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2004-03-16 7:01 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4056A63C.50808@pobox.com \
--to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=jgarzik@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@studorgs.rutgers.edu \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=prism54-devel@prism54.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).