From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: ip_route_me_harder -> xfrm_lookup Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 17:31:06 +0100 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <4059CECA.8080109@trash.net> References: <20040308110331.GA20719@gondor.apana.org.au> <404C874D.4000907@trash.net> <20040308115858.75cdddca.davem@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, netdev@oss.sgi.com, netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org Return-path: To: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <20040308115858.75cdddca.davem@redhat.com> Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org David S. Miller wrote: > On Mon, 08 Mar 2004 15:46:37 +0100 > Patrick McHardy wrote: >> >>I have been working on a set of patches for IPsec+Netfilter, the >>latest set has been posted to netfilter-devel last week. They will >>go in patch-o-matic for testing soon, but I will post them >>to netdev later today, so we won't waste time testing patches >>before Dave is fine with them. > > > Regardless, and I look forward to your work, Herbert's patch is > absolutely correct so I'm going to apply it for now. > > In fact, your work is less likely to be 2.6.4 material I imagine :) > So best to get Herbert's simpler fix in for now. > Sorry for the late reply. You're right of course, Herbert's patch is best for now. The following five mails contain what I've currently got, it's still rough, but I hope you have some suggestions how to avoid some ugly things. Best regards Patrick