From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/5]: netfilter+ipsec - policy checks Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:24:05 +0100 Sender: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <405B1EA5.3030701@trash.net> References: <20040308110331.GA20719@gondor.apana.org.au> <404C874D.4000907@trash.net> <20040308115858.75cdddca.davem@redhat.com> <4059CF27.4030803@trash.net> <20040318221904.45011167.davem@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, netdev@oss.sgi.com, netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org Return-path: To: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <20040318221904.45011167.davem@redhat.com> Errors-To: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org David S. Miller wrote: > Other than the minor comments I've made the most unhappy I am > with the input patch, and you agree it's grotty too. Let's look > for a better solution, perhaps with new top-level SKB state, > and then we can put all of your work in after you're made the other > minor fixes I've asked for as well. I'm going to make the changes you suggested. Can you please explain what you imagine with the new top-level skb state ? Regards Patrick