From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55DD7C00140 for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 11:56:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S241327AbiHOL4f (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Aug 2022 07:56:35 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41582 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229448AbiHOL4d (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Aug 2022 07:56:33 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x42f.google.com (mail-wr1-x42f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C46A1CB3B for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 04:56:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x42f.google.com with SMTP id bu15so298493wrb.7 for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 04:56:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc; bh=od29IOO6gTbC/HZ6aEdfYqUGdCf1E0vK68LS/4dEixg=; b=dAX80bApyf67JCE2DUrctDLbsGity+OOBnYKPNKf8lZNbJr6kDwo+eE1tA4udpKNaz gd5TVOjBuJCQ8l8mZi9ZuRsgTLiHcjpY9YuRIPonUCbWoembeuxEwMEqdItA0HXDeMqh CMtGbSNHmaRMnYLshZ52NoGk2pl8k0pwypsbg7h3fDFNH0kXn/DiEheTIFjjXCZTSBEt D3M9ks7MGOCEzH1A2aMMEAByVQN1h6kdNYoPeqvJSzhfZroQWgiHdOhHxUELgKKgNYU2 91gAd+bNJRKS6NLSQuAfJkdaLExUp9xfzx1qwgHtXTRDlWMMd341GhcQiwp8h98rmKb+ FmJg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=od29IOO6gTbC/HZ6aEdfYqUGdCf1E0vK68LS/4dEixg=; b=VL/Ek6gMjozOG+Byn4PQbx7FepiveQqLjmovjfASagSACHc265wAL5dm6J0RnABQ3Y 5nmvt0T3Hi3L1UbPt1+Z8e3Fz29e35KRX1lpteKUoe47vX+HIsIcal2bWMCanLZRC9oZ tonBncdwtKYexpmv0UC+9fbqDWRB2oRaE2Ufaa6r/8Gg6v6oVGF5hWQilFPr30iI1Y04 w6pzqRazVLaaXOMfGZQGvW4SNbgUFKTUyjTHHGrId1D8SQaRgbedlUyeeoAoZL1DcwiK 8pyHujBByPqLN0civaVjEzx+iLquDeS1NSxXksw/Lh26INQjCdm5RQ0NSpNi0qffSVRZ RoTg== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo0mZo/QfvThaSiZUxDjz7fa5frnWqBnmmWnsIo6dffc1Yvj0zeK 17RkRr70ydrtrjLsuLg4bxzlpA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR49bq7t+WT0onl+f2SU/VXCX07/a4PTztrr5ZOBzp9kZMO+GtM+VNXcCR6lZ2FgpkCrP+Muqw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f10d:0:b0:220:7e4f:ceb6 with SMTP id r13-20020adff10d000000b002207e4fceb6mr8655582wro.316.1660564590874; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 04:56:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.1] (146725694.box.freepro.com. [130.180.211.218]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id m20-20020a05600c3b1400b003a319b67f64sm14804353wms.0.2022.08.15.04.56.27 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 15 Aug 2022 04:56:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <409cd6c3-5ae1-01c6-e774-c60718fa459b@linaro.org> Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 13:56:25 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] Revert "mlxsw: core: Use different get_trend() callbacks for different thermal zones" Content-Language: en-US To: Ido Schimmel Cc: rafael@kernel.org, vadimp@mellanox.com, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vadim Pasternak , Petr Machata , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni References: <20220815091032.1731268-1-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> From: Daniel Lezcano In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org Hi Ido, On 15/08/2022 13:47, Ido Schimmel wrote: > On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 11:10:31AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> This reverts commit 2dc2f760052da4925482ecdcdc5c94d4a599153c. >> >> As discussed in the thread: >> >> https://lore.kernel.org/all/f3c62ebe-7d59-c537-a010-bff366c8aeba@linaro.org/ >> >> the feature provided by commits 2dc2f760052da and 6f73862fabd93 is >> actually already handled by the thermal framework via the cooling >> device state aggregation, thus all this code is pointless. >> >> No conflict happened when reverting the patch. >> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano >> Tested-by: Vadim Pasternak > > Daniel, the intention is to send these patches to mainline as part of > your 6.1 pull request? Yes, I told Vadim I prefer the change to go through my tree because it is part of a rework of the thermal core internals which impact more drivers. > I discussed it with Vadim yesterday and we do not expect changes in the > file during the current cycle so this is OK as far as we are concerned, > but I believe this will also need an ack from one of the netdev > maintainers. Sure. Dave, Eric, Is that fine if the changes go through my tree ? -- Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog