HostAP: alive or dead?

HostAP: alive or dead?

[Jeff Garzik]

I've been wanting to merge it, and starting working on the generic 
wireless layer, for a while now.

Poke.  Poke.

Re: HostAP: alive or dead?

[Luis R. Rodriguez]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 326 bytes --]

On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 02:13:39PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> 
> I've been wanting to merge it, and starting working on the generic 
> wireless layer, for a while now.

Hey Jeff,

can you elaborate on the wireless layer bit?

	Luis

-- 
GnuPG Key fingerprint = 113F B290 C6D2 0251 4D84  A34A 6ADD 4937 E20A 525E

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: HostAP: alive or dead?

[Jouni Malinen]

On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 02:13:39PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:

> I've been wanting to merge it, and starting working on the generic 
> wireless layer, for a while now.

Yes, it is very much alive. However.. I'm sorry I haven't been able to
get enough time to work on finishing the cleanup I planned for 2.6
submission. Another IEEE 802.11 meeting and WPA2 testing took a lot of
time during last weeks. Anyway, it looks like I might not need to travel
anywhere during the following few weeks (well, at least I'm hoping ;-),
so I could try to concentrate on this now.

I'll try to get an initial submission for wireless-2.6 done over the
weekend so that something becomes available for reviewing. What would
be the best format for this? Would it be ok to send a patch against the
current linus-2.5 tree for the couple of modified files (Kconfig,
Makefile) and rest of the files in a separate tarball since they do not
exist in the current tree and are relatively large?

-- 
Jouni Malinen                                            PGP id EFC895FA