Re: e1000 w/ NAPI + SMP = 99% CPU utilization

Re: e1000 w/ NAPI + SMP = 99% CPU utilization

[Chris Carpinello]

>Padraig wrote:
>At what packet rate does it go to 100%?

I haven't narrowed down a threshold.  tcpstat reports bps=202737465
on eth3.  eth0 is a management interface (doesn't packet sniff).  eth1
and eth2 are ifconfig'd down.

>Anyway it's not much to worry about as
>it's in polling mode.

I'm concerned because when I ifconfig down eth3 the kernel panics.
Under high traffic loads, the box will panic as well.  Here's the oops,
which is hand copied from the console:

Oops: 0002 [#1]
SMP
CPU: 0
EIP: 0060:[<c0367896>] Not tainted
EFLAGS: 00010002 (2.6.5)
EIP is at net_rx_action+0x86/0x120
eax: 00200200 ebx: df22b0fc ecx: 0000009d edx: 00100100
esi: df22b000 edi: c1508840 ebp: fffe4c97 esp: dff8bf78
ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068
Process ksoftirqd/0 (pid: 3, threadinfo=dff8a000 task=dff90600)
Stack:
df22b000 df8bf80 000000ec 00000001 c04f1c18 0000000a 00000246 c0126a7a
c04f1c18 dff8a000 dff8a000 dff8a000 c0126f10 c0126f95 dff90600 00000013
dff8a000 dff93f74 00000000 c01367aa 00000000 00000003 00000000 fffffffc
Call Trace:
[<c0126a7a>] do_softirq+0xca/0xd0
[<c0126f10>] ksoftirqd+0x0/0xd0
[<c0126f95>] ksoftirqd+0x85/0xd0
[<c01367aa>] kthread+0xba/0xc0
[<c01366f0>] kthread+0x0/0xc0
[<c01072f5>] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0x10
Code: 89 42 04 89 10 8d 57 1c c7 43 04 00 02 20 00 8b 42 04 89 13
<0> Kernel panic: Fatal exception in interrupt
  In interrupt handler - not syncing

>One thing which should help is to share
>the work across your CPUs. `cat /proc/interrupts`
>will show the interrupts for your nics.

# cat /proc/interrupts
           CPU0       CPU1
  0:    3758655    3223347    IO-APIC-edge  timer
  1:          2          7    IO-APIC-edge  i8042
  2:          0          0          XT-PIC  cascade
  8:          1          0    IO-APIC-edge  rtc
  9:          0          0   IO-APIC-level  acpi
14:         22          7    IO-APIC-edge  ide0
16:         11         11   IO-APIC-level  eth1
17:       5471       5475   IO-APIC-level  eth0
18:       1790       1794   IO-APIC-level  aic7xxx
19:         15         15   IO-APIC-level  aic7xxx
20:          2          1   IO-APIC-level  eth2
24:       1549       1349   IO-APIC-level  eth3
NMI:          0          0
LOC:    6982002    6982001
ERR:          0
MIS:          0

>Then you can bind the interrupt to a particular CPU like:
>
>echo 1 > /proc/irq/$num/smp_affinity
>echo 2 > /proc/irq/$num/smp_affinity
>echo 4 > /proc/irq/$num/smp_affinity
>echo 8 > /proc/irq/$num/smp_affinity

Setting the mask has no noticeable effect on ksoftirqd's
behavior.

- Chris

Re: e1000 w/ NAPI + SMP = 99% CPU utilization

[Robert Olsson]

Chris Carpinello writes:

Hello!

Is seems like your network load @ ~202 Mbps gets you system into 
continuing polling as we see very few interrupts on your eth3.
This means that rx_softirq reschedules itself do_softirq() kicks
ksoftird to prevent the rx_softirq from monopolize the system.
So now all the work gets accounted in ksoftird  And by design 
->poll is strictly serialized per device to guarantee ordering and 
avoid cache bouncing we only see one ksoftirq used as use only have 
one input device.

Pádraig suggest binding to separate CPU's. This is normally a good 
thing but as you only have one input device it will not help.

And didn't we just see a fix for ifconfig down oops?

Cheers.
					--ro


 > >Padraig wrote:
 > >At what packet rate does it go to 100%?
 > 
 > I haven't narrowed down a threshold.  tcpstat reports bps=202737465
 > on eth3.  eth0 is a management interface (doesn't packet sniff).  eth1
 > and eth2 are ifconfig'd down.
 > 
 > >Anyway it's not much to worry about as
 > >it's in polling mode.
 > 
 > I'm concerned because when I ifconfig down eth3 the kernel panics.
 > Under high traffic loads, the box will panic as well.  Here's the oops,
 > which is hand copied from the console:
 > 
 > Oops: 0002 [#1]
 > SMP
 > CPU: 0
 > EIP: 0060:[<c0367896>] Not tainted
 > EFLAGS: 00010002 (2.6.5)
 > EIP is at net_rx_action+0x86/0x120
 > eax: 00200200 ebx: df22b0fc ecx: 0000009d edx: 00100100
 > esi: df22b000 edi: c1508840 ebp: fffe4c97 esp: dff8bf78
 > ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068
 > Process ksoftirqd/0 (pid: 3, threadinfo=dff8a000 task=dff90600)
 > Stack:
 > df22b000 df8bf80 000000ec 00000001 c04f1c18 0000000a 00000246 c0126a7a
 > c04f1c18 dff8a000 dff8a000 dff8a000 c0126f10 c0126f95 dff90600 00000013
 > dff8a000 dff93f74 00000000 c01367aa 00000000 00000003 00000000 fffffffc
 > Call Trace:
 > [<c0126a7a>] do_softirq+0xca/0xd0
 > [<c0126f10>] ksoftirqd+0x0/0xd0
 > [<c0126f95>] ksoftirqd+0x85/0xd0
 > [<c01367aa>] kthread+0xba/0xc0
 > [<c01366f0>] kthread+0x0/0xc0
 > [<c01072f5>] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0x10
 > Code: 89 42 04 89 10 8d 57 1c c7 43 04 00 02 20 00 8b 42 04 89 13
 > <0> Kernel panic: Fatal exception in interrupt
 >   In interrupt handler - not syncing
 > 
 > >One thing which should help is to share
 > >the work across your CPUs. `cat /proc/interrupts`
 > >will show the interrupts for your nics.
 > 
 > # cat /proc/interrupts
 >            CPU0       CPU1
 >   0:    3758655    3223347    IO-APIC-edge  timer
 >   1:          2          7    IO-APIC-edge  i8042
 >   2:          0          0          XT-PIC  cascade
 >   8:          1          0    IO-APIC-edge  rtc
 >   9:          0          0   IO-APIC-level  acpi
 > 14:         22          7    IO-APIC-edge  ide0
 > 16:         11         11   IO-APIC-level  eth1
 > 17:       5471       5475   IO-APIC-level  eth0
 > 18:       1790       1794   IO-APIC-level  aic7xxx
 > 19:         15         15   IO-APIC-level  aic7xxx
 > 20:          2          1   IO-APIC-level  eth2
 > 24:       1549       1349   IO-APIC-level  eth3
 > NMI:          0          0
 > LOC:    6982002    6982001
 > ERR:          0
 > MIS:          0
 > 
 > >Then you can bind the interrupt to a particular CPU like:
 > >
 > >echo 1 > /proc/irq/$num/smp_affinity
 > >echo 2 > /proc/irq/$num/smp_affinity
 > >echo 4 > /proc/irq/$num/smp_affinity
 > >echo 8 > /proc/irq/$num/smp_affinity
 > 
 > Setting the mask has no noticeable effect on ksoftirqd's
 > behavior.
 > 
 > - Chris
 > 
 > 

Re: e1000 w/ NAPI + SMP = 99% CPU utilization

[P]

Robert Olsson wrote:
> Chris Carpinello writes:
> 
> Hello!
> 
> Is seems like your network load @ ~202 Mbps gets you system into 
> continuing polling as we see very few interrupts on your eth3.
> This means that rx_softirq reschedules itself do_softirq() kicks
> ksoftird to prevent the rx_softirq from monopolize the system.
> So now all the work gets accounted in ksoftird  And by design 
> ->poll is strictly serialized per device to guarantee ordering and 
> avoid cache bouncing we only see one ksoftirq used as use only have 
> one input device.
> 
> Pádraig suggest binding to separate CPU's. This is normally a good 
> thing but as you only have one input device it will not help.

agreed. All traffic is on eth3 so you can't share it over CPUs

> And didn't we just see a fix for ifconfig down oops?

yep, seems like it:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdev&m=108631346103966&w=2

Pádraig.

e1000 w/ NAPI + SMP = 99% CPU utilization

[Chris Carpinello]

With a stock 2.6.5 kernel, I'm building the e1000 driver as a module
w/ NAPI turned on for an SMP host (Dell PowerEdge 1650 with 4 1Gb
Intel NICs).  ksoftirqd/0 is using 99% CPU utilization.  However, when
I recompile the kernel with NAPI turned off, ksoftirqd/0 behaves
normally.  Likewise, when I leave NAPI configured but turn off SMP
support, ksoftirqd is fine.  The system in question has 2x Intel
Corp. 82544EI (rev 02) and 2x Intel Corp. 82543GC (rev 02).

I'm willing to test patches.  Please CC me on responses, as I'm not
subscribed.  Thanks.

- Chris

Re: e1000 w/ NAPI + SMP = 99% CPU utilization

[P]

Chris Carpinello wrote:
> With a stock 2.6.5 kernel, I'm building the e1000 driver as a module
> w/ NAPI turned on for an SMP host (Dell PowerEdge 1650 with 4 1Gb
> Intel NICs).  ksoftirqd/0 is using 99% CPU utilization.  However, when
> I recompile the kernel with NAPI turned off, ksoftirqd/0 behaves
> normally.  Likewise, when I leave NAPI configured but turn off SMP
> support, ksoftirqd is fine.  The system in question has 2x Intel
> Corp. 82544EI (rev 02) and 2x Intel Corp. 82543GC (rev 02).
> 
> I'm willing to test patches.  Please CC me on responses, as I'm not
> subscribed.  Thanks.

At what packet rate does it go to 100%?
Anyway it's not much to worry about as
it's in polling mode.

One thing which should help is to share
the work across your CPUs. `cat /proc/interrupts`
will show the interrupts for your nics.
Then you can bind the interrupt to a particular CPU like:

echo 1 > /proc/irq/$num/smp_affinity
echo 2 > /proc/irq/$num/smp_affinity
echo 4 > /proc/irq/$num/smp_affinity
echo 8 > /proc/irq/$num/smp_affinity

Pádraig.