From: David Greaves <david@dgreaves.com>
To: "Venkatesan, Ganesh" <ganesh.venkatesan@intel.com>
Cc: Jens Laas <jens.laas@data.slu.se>,
"Glick, Kevin" <kevin.glick@intel.com>,
netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.6 e1000 NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 22:28:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40D35E95.50104@dgreaves.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040618141629.0edd9766@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net>
OK
Thanks for the pointers and time Stephen, much appreciated :)
Ganesh and Jens - you said you'd like to keep this on-list so Stephen
let's ensure your reply is archived...
David
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>It will be up to Intel (Genesh et al) to look at this.
>
>
>On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 19:44:10 +0100
>David Greaves <david@dgreaves.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>>Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>To get to the root of these problems, could you:
>>>
>>>* Give full lspci -v output for the boards in question.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>ash:
>>00:07.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 1076
>> Subsystem: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 1176
>> Flags: bus master, 66Mhz, medium devsel, latency 32, IRQ 11
>> Memory at e3020000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=128K]
>> Memory at e3000000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=128K]
>> I/O ports at b400 [size=64]
>> Expansion ROM at <unassigned> [disabled] [size=128K]
>> Capabilities: [dc] Power Management version 2
>> Capabilities: [e4] PCI-X non-bridge device.
>> Capabilities: [f0] Message Signalled Interrupts: 64bit+
>>Queue=0/0 Enable-
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>Jun 18 19:38:18 ash kernel: eth0: may be hung last tx was 2457 ticks
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>This means the code that in the e1000 watchdog is seeing the stuck board.
>The driver then calls netif_stop_queue which seems odd.
>
>
>
>>Jun 18 19:38:20 ash kernel: eth0: may be hung last tx was 4457 ticks
>>Jun 18 19:38:22 ash kernel: eth0: may be hung last tx was 6457 ticks
>>Jun 18 19:38:24 ash kernel: eth0: may be hung last tx was 8457 ticks
>>Jun 18 19:38:26 ash kernel: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out
>>after 5000 j
>>iffies
>>Jun 18 19:38:26 ash kernel: eth0: transmit timeout from queuing
>>Jun 18 19:38:26 ash kernel: eth0: may be hung last tx was 10457 ticks
>>Jun 18 19:38:26 ash kernel: eth0: state=0x7 transmit ring size=4096
>>count=256 to_u
>>se=66 to_clean=59
>>
>>
>
>The state bits show:
> XOFF - stopped (but that was done in e1000_watchdog)
> START - board is running
> PRESENT - board is present.
>That looks okay, but what was the state in the e1000 watchdog??
>
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-18 21:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-14 16:47 2.6.6 e1000 NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out David Greaves
[not found] ` <20040615155111.26d6b809@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net>
2004-06-16 10:59 ` David Greaves
2004-06-18 8:04 ` Jens Laas
2004-06-18 9:08 ` 2.6.6 e1000 NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out+ delay scheduler David Greaves
2004-06-18 10:27 ` Jens Laas
2004-06-18 12:51 ` David Greaves
2004-06-21 16:42 ` Thayne Harbaugh
2004-06-21 17:29 ` David Greaves
2004-06-21 17:43 ` ganesh.venkatesan
2004-06-21 18:34 ` David Greaves
2004-06-18 18:11 ` 2.6.6 e1000 NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out Stephen Hemminger
2004-06-18 18:44 ` David Greaves
[not found] ` <20040618141629.0edd9766@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net>
2004-06-18 21:28 ` David Greaves [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40D35E95.50104@dgreaves.com \
--to=david@dgreaves.com \
--cc=ganesh.venkatesan@intel.com \
--cc=jens.laas@data.slu.se \
--cc=kevin.glick@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).