* [PATCH] cleanup large frame handling for natsemi.c
@ 2004-06-20 12:14 Manfred Spraul
2004-06-20 16:30 ` Jeff Garzik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Manfred Spraul @ 2004-06-20 12:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Garzik; +Cc: netdev
Hi,
The DP83815/6 by default rejects frames longer that 1518 bytes
(including crc). This means that a special flag must be set for 8021q -
otherwise mtu sized packets are dropped.
The current driver enables this flag only if the buffer size is above
1536 bytes - this is wrong. Additionally, the nic writes up to two bytes
behind the indicated end of the buffer. This is not documented, thus
I've added 64 bytes - just to be safe.
The patch also removes RX_OFFSET from the rx buffer allocation: The nic
can only receive to 32-bit aligned addresses, it's a left over from a
skeleton driver.
Jeff, could you apply it? I've stress tested vlan for an hour with
tbench and parallel kernel compiles, not obvious problems.
--
Manfred
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] cleanup large frame handling for natsemi.c
2004-06-20 12:14 [PATCH] cleanup large frame handling for natsemi.c Manfred Spraul
@ 2004-06-20 16:30 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-06-20 16:43 ` Manfred Spraul
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2004-06-20 16:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Manfred Spraul; +Cc: netdev
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 02:14:59PM +0200, Manfred Spraul wrote:
> Jeff, could you apply it? I've stress tested vlan for an hour with
> tbench and parallel kernel compiles, not obvious problems.
I would if you had actually included a patch ;-)
Jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] cleanup large frame handling for natsemi.c
2004-06-20 16:30 ` Jeff Garzik
@ 2004-06-20 16:43 ` Manfred Spraul
2004-06-20 18:38 ` Jeff Garzik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Manfred Spraul @ 2004-06-20 16:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Garzik; +Cc: netdev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 338 bytes --]
Jeff Garzik wrote:
>On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 02:14:59PM +0200, Manfred Spraul wrote:
>
>
>>Jeff, could you apply it? I've stress tested vlan for an hour with
>>tbench and parallel kernel compiles, not obvious problems.
>>
>>
>
>I would if you had actually included a patch ;-)
>
>
>
Ups, sorry. Here's the patch.
--
Manfred
[-- Attachment #2: patch-natsemi-long --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2797 bytes --]
--- 2.6/drivers/net/natsemi.c 2004-06-20 11:24:02.959200463 +0200
+++ build-2.6/drivers/net/natsemi.c 2004-06-20 12:11:31.170607816 +0200
@@ -236,7 +236,14 @@
#define NATSEMI_REGS_SIZE (NATSEMI_NREGS * sizeof(u32))
#define NATSEMI_EEPROM_SIZE 24 /* 12 16-bit values */
-#define PKT_BUF_SZ 1536 /* Size of each temporary Rx buffer. */
+/* Buffer sizes:
+ * The nic writes 32-bit values, even if the upper bytes of
+ * a 32-bit value are beyond the end of the buffer.
+ */
+#define NATSEMI_HEADERS 22 /* 2*mac,type,vlan,crc */
+#define NATSEMI_PADDING 64 /* 2 bytes should be sufficient */
+#define NATSEMI_LONGPKT 1518 /* limit for long packets */
+#define NATSEMI_RX_LIMIT 2046 /* maximum supported by hardware */
/* These identify the driver base version and may not be removed. */
static char version[] __devinitdata =
@@ -1688,7 +1695,7 @@
*/
np->rx_config = RxMxdma_256 | 0x20;
/* if receive ring now has bigger buffers than normal, enable jumbo */
- if (np->rx_buf_sz > PKT_BUF_SZ)
+ if (np->rx_buf_sz > NATSEMI_LONGPKT)
np->rx_config |= RxAcceptLong;
writel(np->rx_config, ioaddr + RxConfig);
@@ -1870,7 +1877,7 @@
struct sk_buff *skb;
int entry = np->dirty_rx % RX_RING_SIZE;
if (np->rx_skbuff[entry] == NULL) {
- unsigned int buflen = np->rx_buf_sz + RX_OFFSET;
+ unsigned int buflen = np->rx_buf_sz+NATSEMI_PADDING;
skb = dev_alloc_skb(buflen);
np->rx_skbuff[entry] = skb;
if (skb == NULL)
@@ -1909,9 +1916,13 @@
np->dirty_rx = 0;
np->cur_rx = RX_RING_SIZE;
np->oom = 0;
- np->rx_buf_sz = PKT_BUF_SZ;
- if (dev->mtu > ETH_DATA_LEN)
- np->rx_buf_sz += dev->mtu - ETH_DATA_LEN;
+ if (dev->mtu <= ETH_DATA_LEN)
+ np->rx_buf_sz = ETH_DATA_LEN + NATSEMI_HEADERS;
+ else
+ np->rx_buf_sz = dev->mtu + NATSEMI_HEADERS;
+ if (np->rx_buf_sz > NATSEMI_RX_LIMIT)
+ np->rx_buf_sz = NATSEMI_RX_LIMIT;
+
np->rx_head_desc = &np->rx_ring[0];
/* Please be carefull before changing this loop - at least gcc-2.95.1
@@ -1949,7 +1960,7 @@
static void drain_ring(struct net_device *dev)
{
struct netdev_private *np = dev->priv;
- unsigned int buflen = np->rx_buf_sz + RX_OFFSET;
+ unsigned int buflen = np->rx_buf_sz;
int i;
/* Free all the skbuffs in the Rx queue. */
@@ -2154,7 +2165,7 @@
int entry = np->cur_rx % RX_RING_SIZE;
int boguscnt = np->dirty_rx + RX_RING_SIZE - np->cur_rx;
s32 desc_status = le32_to_cpu(np->rx_head_desc->cmd_status);
- unsigned int buflen = np->rx_buf_sz + RX_OFFSET;
+ unsigned int buflen = np->rx_buf_sz;
/* If the driver owns the next entry it's a new packet. Send it up. */
while (desc_status < 0) { /* e.g. & DescOwn */
@@ -2881,6 +2892,7 @@
}
return 0;
}
+
static int netdev_ioctl(struct net_device *dev, struct ifreq *rq, int cmd)
{
struct mii_ioctl_data *data = if_mii(rq);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] cleanup large frame handling for natsemi.c
2004-06-20 16:43 ` Manfred Spraul
@ 2004-06-20 18:38 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-06-20 19:31 ` Manfred Spraul
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2004-06-20 18:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Manfred Spraul; +Cc: netdev
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 06:43:07PM +0200, Manfred Spraul wrote:
> @@ -1909,9 +1916,13 @@
> np->dirty_rx = 0;
> np->cur_rx = RX_RING_SIZE;
> np->oom = 0;
> - np->rx_buf_sz = PKT_BUF_SZ;
> - if (dev->mtu > ETH_DATA_LEN)
> - np->rx_buf_sz += dev->mtu - ETH_DATA_LEN;
> + if (dev->mtu <= ETH_DATA_LEN)
> + np->rx_buf_sz = ETH_DATA_LEN + NATSEMI_HEADERS;
> + else
> + np->rx_buf_sz = dev->mtu + NATSEMI_HEADERS;
> + if (np->rx_buf_sz > NATSEMI_RX_LIMIT)
> + np->rx_buf_sz = NATSEMI_RX_LIMIT;
> +
Double NAK:
1) Use PKT_BUF_SZ, don't alloc smaller than that.
2) The final check should not be needed. The code should guarantee that
np->rx_buf_sz never exceeds NATSEMI_RX_LIMIT.
Jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] cleanup large frame handling for natsemi.c
2004-06-20 18:38 ` Jeff Garzik
@ 2004-06-20 19:31 ` Manfred Spraul
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Manfred Spraul @ 2004-06-20 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Garzik; +Cc: netdev
Jeff Garzik wrote:
>On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 06:43:07PM +0200, Manfred Spraul wrote:
>
>
>>@@ -1909,9 +1916,13 @@
>> np->dirty_rx = 0;
>> np->cur_rx = RX_RING_SIZE;
>> np->oom = 0;
>>- np->rx_buf_sz = PKT_BUF_SZ;
>>- if (dev->mtu > ETH_DATA_LEN)
>>- np->rx_buf_sz += dev->mtu - ETH_DATA_LEN;
>>+ if (dev->mtu <= ETH_DATA_LEN)
>>+ np->rx_buf_sz = ETH_DATA_LEN + NATSEMI_HEADERS;
>>+ else
>>+ np->rx_buf_sz = dev->mtu + NATSEMI_HEADERS;
>>+ if (np->rx_buf_sz > NATSEMI_RX_LIMIT)
>>+ np->rx_buf_sz = NATSEMI_RX_LIMIT;
>>+
>>
>>
>
>Double NAK:
>
>1) Use PKT_BUF_SZ, don't alloc smaller than that.
>
>
>
The alloc size is never smaller than PKT_BUF_SZ:
ETH_DATA_LEN+NATSEMI_HEADERS+NATSEMI_PADDING is 1586 bytes [still
smaller than the 1620 byte skb kmalloc cache]
>2) The final check should not be needed. The code should guarantee that
>np->rx_buf_sz never exceeds NATSEMI_RX_LIMIT.
>
>
>
You mean: implement a change_mtu callback and reject mtu values above
2020 byte?
--
Manfred
> Jeff
>
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-06-20 19:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-06-20 12:14 [PATCH] cleanup large frame handling for natsemi.c Manfred Spraul
2004-06-20 16:30 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-06-20 16:43 ` Manfred Spraul
2004-06-20 18:38 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-06-20 19:31 ` Manfred Spraul
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).