From: Andre Tomt <andre@tomt.net>
To: netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: [Fwd: Remote DoS vulnerability in Linux kernel 2.6.x]
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 21:38:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40E316C4.30205@tomt.net> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 113 bytes --]
I would guess you guys know about this one - but just in case.
Is the patch provided safe? Is the problem real?
[-- Attachment #2: Remote DoS vulnerability in Linux kernel 2.6.x --]
[-- Type: message/rfc822, Size: 4733 bytes --]
From: Adam Osuchowski <adwol@polsl.gliwice.pl>
To: bugtraq@securityfocus.com
Subject: Remote DoS vulnerability in Linux kernel 2.6.x
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:57:17 +0200
Message-ID: <20040630105717.GA4294@polsl.gliwice.pl>
1. Overview
-----------
There is a remotely exploitable bug in all Linux kernel 2.6 series due to
using incorrect variable type. Vulnerability is connected to netfilter
subsystem and may cause DoS. It's disclosed only when using iptables with
rules matching TCP options (i.e. --tcp-option). There is no difference
what action is taking up by matching rule.
Vulnerability was detected on i386 architecture. The other ones weren't tested
but it seems to be vulnerable too.
2. Details
----------
Problem lies in tcp_find_option() function (net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c).
There is local array `opt' defined as:
char opt[60 - sizeof(struct tcphdr)];
which contains TCP options extracted from packet. Function mentioned above
searches for specified option in this array.
Options in TCP packet, with some exceptions, are organized in the following
way:
Octet no. Length Field
-----------------------------
0 1 Opcode
1 1 Length of all option (N + 2)
2 N Params
The function iterates over options in array:
for (i = 0; i < optlen; ) {
if (opt[i] == option) return !invert;
if (opt[i] < 2) i++;
else i += opt[i+1]?:1;
}
moving counter by the option length.
But, in case the `length' value is greater than 127, the value of this octet
in `opt' is implicitly casted to char, which results in negative number and
the loop counter moving back. In some cases it is possible, that counter
cycles throught the contents of this array infinitely.
3. Impact
---------
After sending one suitably prepared TCP packet to victim host, kernel goes
into infinite loop consuming all CPU resources, rendering the box
unresponsable. Of course, there is no need to have a shell access to attacked
host.
4. Exploitation
---------------
Example of packet-of-death:
0x0000: 4500 0030 1234 4000 ff06 e83f c0a8 0001
0x0010: c0a8 0002 0400 1000 0000 0064 0000 0064
0x0020: 7000 0fa0 dc6a 0000 0204 05b4 0101 04fd
5. Fix
------
There is only need to change type of `opt' array from signed char to unsigned
(or, better to u_int8_t) as it was defined in 2.4 kernel or prior to version
1.16 of net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c file.
--- net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c.orig 2004-04-04 05:36:47.000000000 +0200
+++ net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c 2004-06-24 21:24:26.000000000 +0200
@@ -1461,7 +1461,7 @@
int *hotdrop)
{
/* tcp.doff is only 4 bits, ie. max 15 * 4 bytes */
- char opt[60 - sizeof(struct tcphdr)];
+ u_int8_t opt[60 - sizeof(struct tcphdr)];
unsigned int i;
duprintf("tcp_match: finding option\n");
6. Credits
----------
Vulnerability was discovered, identified and fixed by Adam Osuchowski
and Tomasz Dubinski.
--
## Adam Osuchowski adwol@polsl.gliwice.pl, adwol@silesia.linux.org.pl
## Silesian University of Technology, Computer Centre Gliwice, Poland
reply other threads:[~2004-06-30 19:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40E316C4.30205@tomt.net \
--to=andre@tomt.net \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).