From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
To: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, dsahern@kernel.org,
willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, willemb@google.com,
ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
eddyz87@gmail.com, song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me,
haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, horms@kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v6 08/13] net-timestamp: support hw SCM_TSTAMP_SND for bpf extension
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 16:46:47 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40e2a7d8-dcba-4dfe-8c4d-14d8cf4954cf@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250121012901.87763-9-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
On 1/20/25 5:28 PM, Jason Xing wrote:
> In this patch, we finish the hardware part. Then bpf program can
> fetch the hwstamp from skb directly.
>
> To avoid changing so many callers using SKBTX_HW_TSTAMP from drivers,
> use this simple modification like this patch does to support printing
> hardware timestamp.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
> ---
> include/linux/skbuff.h | 4 +++-
> include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 5 +++++
> net/core/skbuff.c | 11 ++++++-----
> net/dsa/user.c | 2 +-
> net/socket.c | 2 +-
> tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 5 +++++
> 6 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h
> index de8d3bd311f5..df2d790ae36b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
> +++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
> @@ -471,7 +471,7 @@ struct skb_shared_hwtstamps {
> /* Definitions for tx_flags in struct skb_shared_info */
> enum {
> /* generate hardware time stamp */
> - SKBTX_HW_TSTAMP = 1 << 0,
> + __SKBTX_HW_TSTAMP = 1 << 0,
>
> /* generate software time stamp when queueing packet to NIC */
> SKBTX_SW_TSTAMP = 1 << 1,
> @@ -495,6 +495,8 @@ enum {
> SKBTX_BPF = 1 << 7,
> };
>
> +#define SKBTX_HW_TSTAMP (__SKBTX_HW_TSTAMP | SKBTX_BPF)
> +
> #define SKBTX_ANY_SW_TSTAMP (SKBTX_SW_TSTAMP | \
> SKBTX_SCHED_TSTAMP | \
> SKBTX_BPF)
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> index a6d761f07f67..8936e1061e71 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -7032,6 +7032,11 @@ enum {
> * feature is on. It indicates the
> * recorded timestamp.
> */
> + BPF_SOCK_OPS_TS_HW_OPT_CB, /* Called in hardware phase when
> + * SO_TIMESTAMPING feature is on.
Same comment on the "SO_TIMESTAMPING".
It will be useful to elaborate more on "hardware phase", like exactly when it
will be called,
> + * It indicates the recorded
> + * timestamp.
and the hwtstamps will be in the skb.
> + */
> };
>
> /* List of TCP states. There is a build check in net/ipv4/tcp.c to detect
> diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
> index 288eb9869827..c769feae5162 100644
> --- a/net/core/skbuff.c
> +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
> @@ -5548,7 +5548,7 @@ static bool skb_enable_app_tstamp(struct sk_buff *skb, int tstype, bool sw)
> flag = SKBTX_SCHED_TSTAMP;
> break;
> case SCM_TSTAMP_SND:
> - flag = sw ? SKBTX_SW_TSTAMP : SKBTX_HW_TSTAMP;
> + flag = sw ? SKBTX_SW_TSTAMP : __SKBTX_HW_TSTAMP;
> break;
> case SCM_TSTAMP_ACK:
> if (TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->txstamp_ack)
> @@ -5565,7 +5565,8 @@ static bool skb_enable_app_tstamp(struct sk_buff *skb, int tstype, bool sw)
> }
>
> static void skb_tstamp_tx_bpf(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sock *sk,
> - int tstype, bool sw)
> + int tstype, bool sw,
> + struct skb_shared_hwtstamps *hwtstamps)
> {
> int op;
>
> @@ -5577,9 +5578,9 @@ static void skb_tstamp_tx_bpf(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sock *sk,
> op = BPF_SOCK_OPS_TS_SCHED_OPT_CB;
> break;
> case SCM_TSTAMP_SND:
> + op = sw ? BPF_SOCK_OPS_TS_SW_OPT_CB : BPF_SOCK_OPS_TS_HW_OPT_CB;
> if (!sw)
> - return;
> - op = BPF_SOCK_OPS_TS_SW_OPT_CB;
> + *skb_hwtstamps(skb) = *hwtstamps;
hwtstamps may still be NULL, no?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-25 0:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-21 1:28 [RFC PATCH net-next v6 00/13] net-timestamp: bpf extension to equip applications transparently Jason Xing
2025-01-21 1:28 ` [RFC PATCH net-next v6 01/13] net-timestamp: add support for bpf_setsockopt() Jason Xing
2025-01-21 1:28 ` [RFC PATCH net-next v6 02/13] net-timestamp: prepare for timestamping callbacks use Jason Xing
2025-01-21 5:08 ` Jason Xing
2025-01-21 1:28 ` [RFC PATCH net-next v6 03/13] bpf: stop UDP sock accessing TCP fields in bpf callbacks Jason Xing
2025-01-24 23:40 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-25 0:28 ` Jason Xing
2025-01-28 1:34 ` Jason Xing
2025-01-21 1:28 ` [RFC PATCH net-next v6 04/13] bpf: stop UDP sock accessing TCP fields in sock_op BPF CALLs Jason Xing
2025-01-25 0:28 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-25 1:15 ` Jason Xing
2025-01-25 1:32 ` Jason Xing
2025-01-25 2:25 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-25 2:58 ` Jason Xing
2025-01-25 3:12 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-25 3:43 ` Jason Xing
2025-01-21 1:28 ` [RFC PATCH net-next v6 05/13] net-timestamp: prepare for isolating two modes of SO_TIMESTAMPING Jason Xing
2025-01-21 1:28 ` [RFC PATCH net-next v6 06/13] net-timestamp: support SCM_TSTAMP_SCHED for bpf extension Jason Xing
2025-01-25 0:38 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-25 1:16 ` Jason Xing
2025-01-21 1:28 ` [RFC PATCH net-next v6 07/13] net-timestamp: support sw SCM_TSTAMP_SND " Jason Xing
2025-01-25 0:40 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-25 1:17 ` Jason Xing
2025-01-21 1:28 ` [RFC PATCH net-next v6 08/13] net-timestamp: support hw " Jason Xing
2025-01-25 0:46 ` Martin KaFai Lau [this message]
2025-01-25 1:18 ` Jason Xing
2025-01-25 1:29 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-25 1:35 ` Jason Xing
2025-01-25 2:36 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-25 2:59 ` Jason Xing
2025-01-21 1:28 ` [RFC PATCH net-next v6 09/13] net-timestamp: support SCM_TSTAMP_ACK " Jason Xing
2025-01-21 1:28 ` [RFC PATCH net-next v6 10/13] net-timestamp: make TCP tx timestamp bpf extension work Jason Xing
2025-01-21 1:28 ` [RFC PATCH net-next v6 11/13] net-timestamp: add a new callback in tcp_tx_timestamp() Jason Xing
2025-01-25 0:50 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-25 1:21 ` Jason Xing
2025-01-21 1:29 ` [RFC PATCH net-next v6 12/13] net-timestamp: introduce cgroup lock to avoid affecting non-bpf cases Jason Xing
2025-01-25 1:09 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-25 1:25 ` Jason Xing
2025-01-21 1:29 ` [RFC PATCH net-next v6 13/13] bpf: add simple bpf tests in the tx path for so_timestamping feature Jason Xing
2025-01-25 3:07 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-25 3:42 ` Jason Xing
2025-01-27 23:49 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-28 0:19 ` Jason Xing
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40e2a7d8-dcba-4dfe-8c4d-14d8cf4954cf@linux.dev \
--to=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).