From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Cc: laforge@netfilter.org, okir@suse.de, netdev@oss.sgi.com,
netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Prevent crash on ip_conntrack removal
Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 14:58:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41289859.2040803@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040821221344.6dbc98ed.davem@redhat.com>
David S. Miller wrote:
>On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 17:10:20 +0200
>Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> wrote:
>
>>The problem is that conntrack unload can cause packets without a
>>dst_entry to appear in ip_local_deliver, which is already after
>>the call to dst_input.
>>
>>
>
>How can it call ip_local_deliver() without a valid skb->dst?
>That function is only invoked via skb->dst->input(skb) which
>by implication means that skb->dst is non-NULL.
>
>Actually there is a call via ip_mr_input() but that code also
>has a precondition that skb->dst is non-NULL too. I say this
>due to the unchecked skb->dst accesses it makes early on.
>
>Please explain. I don't question that it happens, just show
>me how :-)
>
>
The first fragment (offset=0) is given to ip_defrag by conntrack
at PRE_ROUTING, without a dst_entry. Then conntrack is unloaded.
Further fragments are now queued in ip_local_deliver. When the
packet is reassembled and "continues" its way from
ip_local_deliver, it doesn't have a dst_entry.
The opposite way is of course also possible, packets queued in
ip_local_deliver can jump and appear in the PRE_ROUTING hook
when conntrack is loaded, but that way doesn't seem to cause
problems.
Regards
Patrick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-22 12:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-18 9:13 [PATCH] Prevent crash on ip_conntrack removal Olaf Kirch
2004-08-19 10:11 ` Harald Welte
2004-08-19 14:18 ` David S. Miller
2004-08-19 14:55 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-08-19 15:14 ` David S. Miller
2004-08-21 15:10 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-08-22 5:13 ` David S. Miller
2004-08-22 12:58 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2004-08-23 5:03 ` David S. Miller
2004-08-23 21:18 ` David Stevens
2004-08-24 0:45 ` Nivedita Singhvi
2004-08-24 0:45 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-08-24 21:28 ` David Stevens
2004-08-29 6:15 ` David S. Miller
2004-08-29 19:36 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-08-29 19:57 ` David S. Miller
2004-08-29 20:06 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-08-29 21:58 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-08-29 23:38 ` David S. Miller
2004-08-30 0:50 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-08-30 4:28 ` David S. Miller
2004-08-29 21:48 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-08-30 7:57 ` Olaf Kirch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41289859.2040803@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=laforge@netfilter.org \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=okir@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).