From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Changli Gao" Subject: Re: TCP receive splice performance Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 21:01:16 +0800 Message-ID: <412e6f7f0805120601h1121deaewd69ecebc744f258d@mail.gmail.com> References: <200805121545.50390.opurdila@ixiacom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "Jens Axboe" To: "Octavian Purdila" Return-path: Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.142.191]:14620 "EHLO ti-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758129AbYELNBW (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 May 2008 09:01:22 -0400 Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b6so776459tic.23 for ; Mon, 12 May 2008 06:01:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <200805121545.50390.opurdila@ixiacom.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 8:45 PM, Octavian Purdila wrote: > > In the second test case the same test was performed, only this time with some > modification in the network stack to disable the copying from/to userspace. > Throughput was 122-123MB which is practically line-rate. It is interesting. Could you show us your modification? -- Regards， Changli Gao(xiaosuo@gmail.com)