From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Changli Gao Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] act_mirred: optimization Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:22:46 +0800 Message-ID: <412e6f7f0911160522w34895b0eked14f69ccc62c96b@mail.gmail.com> References: <20091116.024839.257258321.davem@davemloft.net> <20091116.025859.78494103.davem@davemloft.net> <412e6f7f0911160505x10da9a92j694669db9d030da1@mail.gmail.com> <20091116.051722.255835290.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: hadi@cyberus.ca, shemminger@vyatta.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-pw0-f42.google.com ([209.85.160.42]:47128 "EHLO mail-pw0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752809AbZKPNWk convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Nov 2009 08:22:40 -0500 Received: by pwi3 with SMTP id 3so3255443pwi.21 for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 05:22:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20091116.051722.255835290.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 9:17 PM, David Miller wro= te: > From: Changli Gao > Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:05:28 +0800 > >> I am sorry about that. But I did test it before submitting these two= , >> and I am just wondering if they are applied without any error. Would >> you post the file after being patched? I think it will be helpful to >> finger out the real problem. > > I don't have time for that sorry. Thanks all the same! > > I think the problem might be that you are developing against > either net-2.6 or Linus's tree, whereas you should be working > against net-next-2.6 > I am working against linux-next. I'll check if there is any difference. BTW: were these patches applied in order, 1 - 2? --=20 Regards=EF=BC=8C Changli Gao(xiaosuo@gmail.com)