From: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
therbert@google.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] rps: Receive Packet Steering
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:59:05 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <412e6f7f1003170059r1f0fa4cfrbe8b3f22102ee9d9@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1268809673.2932.62.camel@edumazet-laptop>
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
> Le mercredi 17 mars 2010 à 09:54 +0800, Changli Gao a écrit :
>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 5:13 AM, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>> >
>> > I'll integrate this as soon as I open up net-next-2.6
>>
>> It is really a good news. Now linux also can dispatch packets as
>> FreeBSD does via netisr. Can we walk farer, and support weighted
>> distribution?
>>
>
> May I ask why ? What would be the goal ?
>
For example, I have a firewall with dual core CPU, and use core 0 for
IRQ and dispatching. If I use both core 0 and core 1 for the left
processing, core 0 will be overloaded, and if I use core 1 for the
left processing, core 0 will be light load. In order to take full of
advantage of hardware, I need weighted the packet distribution.
--
Regards，
Changli Gao(xiaosuo@gmail.com)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-17 7:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-12 20:13 [PATCH v7] rps: Receive Packet Steering Tom Herbert
2010-03-12 21:28 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-03-12 23:08 ` Tom Herbert
2010-03-16 18:03 ` Tom Herbert
2010-03-16 21:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-03-16 21:13 ` David Miller
2010-03-17 1:54 ` Changli Gao
2010-03-17 7:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-03-17 7:59 ` Changli Gao [this message]
2010-03-17 14:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-03-17 15:01 ` Tom Herbert
2010-03-17 15:34 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-03-17 23:50 ` Tom Herbert
2010-03-18 2:14 ` Changli Gao
2010-03-18 6:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-03-18 6:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-03-18 6:48 ` Changli Gao
2010-03-18 20:37 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-03-18 21:23 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-03-17 4:26 ` David Miller
2010-03-12 22:20 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-03-12 22:32 ` David Miller
2010-03-12 22:23 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-03-12 22:33 ` David Miller
2010-03-12 23:05 ` Tom Herbert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=412e6f7f1003170059r1f0fa4cfrbe8b3f22102ee9d9@mail.gmail.com \
--to=xiaosuo@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=therbert@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).