David S. Miller wrote:

>I think I agree with David now that I've read through this a few
>times.  Can someone send me a patch which does this?
>  
>
Attached. The first patch still crashed, we need to prevent new
fragments from getting queued after the queue is flushed until the
hook in unregistered.

>Does 2.4.x have this problem too?  I thought it didn't.
>  
>
I'll have a look, but I think it does.

Regards
Patrick