From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
David Stevens <dlstevens@us.ibm.com>,
davem@redhat.com, laforge@netfilter.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com,
netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com, netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org,
okir@suse.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Prevent crash on ip_conntrack removal
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 23:48:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41324F2C.4090003@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4132303C.2060807@trash.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1373 bytes --]
Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Attached. The first patch still crashed, we need to prevent new
> fragments from getting queued after the queue is flushed until the
> hook in unregistered.
The patch is racy, another CPU could already have passed the check
for ip_ct_no_defrag and queue the packet after __ip_evictor calculated
the work to do, so the packet (or another one) will not get evicted.
This patch on top calls synchronize_net() to prevent this.
>
>@@ -1181,6 +1183,12 @@
> #ifdef CONFIG_NETFILTER_DEBUG
> unsigned int olddebug = skb->nf_debug;
> #endif
>+
>+ if (unlikely(ip_ct_no_defrag)) {
>+ kfree_skb(skb);
>+ return NULL;
>+ }
>+
> if (sk) {
> sock_hold(sk);
> skb_orphan(skb);
>diff -Nru a/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_standalone.c b/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_standalone.c
>--- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_standalone.c 2004-08-29 20:55:13 +02:00
>+++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_standalone.c 2004-08-29 20:55:13 +02:00
>@@ -805,6 +805,12 @@
> cleanup_defraglocalops:
> nf_unregister_hook(&ip_conntrack_defrag_local_out_ops);
> cleanup_defragops:
>+ /* Frag queues may hold fragments with skb->dst == NULL */
>+ ip_ct_no_defrag = 1;
>+ smp_wmb();
>+ local_bh_disable();
>+ ipfrag_flush();
>+ local_bh_enable();
> nf_unregister_hook(&ip_conntrack_defrag_ops);
> cleanup_proc_stat:
> proc_net_remove("ip_conntrack_stat");
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: x --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 875 bytes --]
# This is a BitKeeper generated diff -Nru style patch.
#
# ChangeSet
# 2004/08/29 23:36:17+02:00 kaber@coreworks.de
# [NETFILTER]: Fix race when flushing fragment queue
#
# Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
#
# net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_standalone.c
# 2004/08/29 23:35:54+02:00 kaber@coreworks.de +1 -1
# [NETFILTER]: Fix race when flushing fragment queue
#
diff -Nru a/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_standalone.c b/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_standalone.c
--- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_standalone.c 2004-08-29 23:39:07 +02:00
+++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_standalone.c 2004-08-29 23:39:07 +02:00
@@ -807,7 +807,7 @@
cleanup_defragops:
/* Frag queues may hold fragments with skb->dst == NULL */
ip_ct_no_defrag = 1;
- smp_wmb();
+ synchronize_net();
local_bh_disable();
ipfrag_flush();
local_bh_enable();
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-29 21:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-18 9:13 [PATCH] Prevent crash on ip_conntrack removal Olaf Kirch
2004-08-19 10:11 ` Harald Welte
2004-08-19 14:18 ` David S. Miller
2004-08-19 14:55 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-08-19 15:14 ` David S. Miller
2004-08-21 15:10 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-08-22 5:13 ` David S. Miller
2004-08-22 12:58 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-08-23 5:03 ` David S. Miller
2004-08-23 21:18 ` David Stevens
2004-08-24 0:45 ` Nivedita Singhvi
2004-08-24 0:45 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-08-24 21:28 ` David Stevens
2004-08-29 6:15 ` David S. Miller
2004-08-29 19:36 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-08-29 19:57 ` David S. Miller
2004-08-29 20:06 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-08-29 21:58 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-08-29 23:38 ` David S. Miller
2004-08-30 0:50 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-08-30 4:28 ` David S. Miller
2004-08-29 21:48 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2004-08-30 7:57 ` Olaf Kirch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41324F2C.4090003@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=dlstevens@us.ibm.com \
--cc=laforge@netfilter.org \
--cc=netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=okir@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).